Marvel RivalsFPS onCore i5-13500TE&GeForce RTX 4090

Marvel Rivals

A competitor to Overwatch featuring environmental destruction, which makes it CPU heavy. DX12 and 12GB of RAM are the minimum requirements.

Marvel Rivals - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low480 FPS
medium413 FPS
high305 FPS
ultra263 FPS
1440P
low357 FPS
medium323 FPS
high259 FPS
ultra234 FPS
4K
low189 FPS
medium172 FPS
high148 FPS
ultra118 FPS

Performance Report

Marvel Rivals

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i5-13500TE
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 263 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 234 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 118 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 131% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060 Super) for Marvel Rivals. The Core i5-13500TE is 0% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10400).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i5-13500TE sets the FPS ceiling at 4k (low/medium/high), while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, 4k ultra.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i5-13500TE:$250(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $235

Combo price: $1899. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 263 FPS, equivalent to 0.14 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.253 fps/$0.217 fps/$0.161 fps/$0.138 fps/$
1440p0.188 fps/$0.170 fps/$0.136 fps/$0.123 fps/$
4k0.100 fps/$0.091 fps/$0.078 fps/$0.062 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i5-13500TE|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k high, the Core i5-13500TE sets the ceiling at about 148 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 163 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 9% (FPS gap: 15 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 3/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 9/12.

Verdict

Well Balanced

The Core i5-13500TE and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 8%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 8%
HighCPU Limits GPU 9%
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i5-13500TE and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU82% - 90%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
Medium
CPU82% - 91%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
High
CPU82% - 91%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU85% - 92%
<>
GPU77% - 84%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU83% - 90%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
Medium
CPU83% - 90%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
High
CPU83% - 90%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU83% - 90%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU79% - 90%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
Medium
CPU79% - 91%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
High
CPU79% - 91%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU79% - 91%
<>
GPU78% - 85%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i5-13500TE + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 79% and 92% and GPU utilization between 77% and 85%. Core i5-13500TE reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 82% at 1080p to 82% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 87% to 85%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 82% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i5-13500TE peaks at 88% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 87% and GPU 82%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 86% and GPU 82%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 85% and GPU 82%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 84% (79-90%) and GPU 82% (78-85%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-13500TE remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i5-13500TE and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Marvel Rivals Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i5-13500TE
cpu icon
21,936
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-6600K
RecommendedCore i5-10400
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1060
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060 Super

Your CPU is 0% above and your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+0%vsrecommended

GPU

+131%vsrecommended

CPU

+69%vsminimum

GPU

+279%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1060
Processor: Core i5-6600K
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 70 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Processor: Core i5-10400
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 70 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i5-13500TE and GeForce RTX 4090 run Marvel Rivals well?

Yes, the Core i5-13500TE paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Marvel Rivals smoothly up to 4k achieving around 118 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 0% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Marvel Rivals?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1899 ($250 CPU (Rank #217 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Marvel Rivals performance?

For Marvel Rivals, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-13500TE is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Marvel Rivals?

Marvel Rivals does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Marvel Rivals?

Marvel Rivals requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1060 (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 70 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10400 and GeForce RTX 2060 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your Core i5-13500TE and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Marvel Rivals FPS estimates for the Core i5-13500TE and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Marvel Rivals FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.