TerrariaFPS onCore i7-13700KF&GeForce RTX 4090

Terraria

A classic 2D sandbox. While generally light, heavy boss fights and fluid physics can slow down older CPUs. It requires Shader Model 2.0 support.

This game has a built-in FPS cap of 60 FPS

Terraria - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1440P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
4K
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS

Performance Report

Terraria

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i7-13700KF
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 118 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 112 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 109 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 6804% above the recommended GPU (GeForce 9600 GT) for Terraria. The Core i7-13700KF is 1987% above the recommended CPU (Core 2 Duo).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i7-13700KF sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at all 4k settings.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i7-13700KF:$350(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $384

Combo price: $1999. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 120 FPS, equivalent to 0.06 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.059 fps/$0.059 fps/$0.060 fps/$0.060 fps/$
1440p0.056 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.058 fps/$0.059 fps/$
4k0.055 fps/$0.055 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.057 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i7-13700KF|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p high, the Core i7-13700KF sets the ceiling at about 116 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 145 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 20% (FPS gap: 29 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 8/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 4/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i7-13700KF is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 19%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 19%
HighCPU Limits GPU 20%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 20%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 8%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 8%
HighCPU Limits GPU 7%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 7%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i7-13700KF and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU3% - 27%
<>
GPU13% - 32%
<>
Medium
CPU3% - 27%
<>
GPU13% - 32%
<>
High
CPU3% - 27%
<>
GPU13% - 32%
<>
Ultra
CPU15% - 48%
<>
GPU11% - 27%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU3% - 4%
<>
GPU20% - 41%
<>
Medium
CPU3% - 4%
<>
GPU20% - 41%
<>
High
CPU3% - 4%
<>
GPU20% - 41%
<>
Ultra
CPU12% - 19%
<>
GPU22% - 46%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU0% - 0%
GPU27% - 50%
<>
Medium
CPU0% - 0%
GPU27% - 50%
<>
High
CPU0% - 0%
GPU27% - 50%
<>
Ultra
CPU4% - 7%
<>
GPU30% - 54%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i7-13700KF + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 0% and 48% and GPU utilization between 11% and 54%. Core i7-13700KF keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 21% at 1080p to 39% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 19% to 2%.

Load Interpretation

Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 48% and GPU at 54%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 19% and GPU 21%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 7% and GPU 31%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 2% and GPU 39%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 6% (4-7%) and GPU 42% (30-54%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i7-13700KF remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i7-13700KF and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Terraria Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i7-13700KF
cpu icon
45,730
Your Score
MinimumPentium 4
RecommendedCore 2 Duo
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce FX 5900
RecommendedGeForce 9600 GT

Your CPU is 1987% above and your GPU is 6804% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+1987%vsrecommended

GPU

+6804%vsrecommended

CPU

+1424%vsminimum

GPU

+2422%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce FX 5900
Processor: Pentium 4
Memory: 2.5 GB
Disk Space: 200 MB
System: Windows 7
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce 9600 GT
Processor: Core 2 Duo
Memory: 4 GB
Disk Space: 200 MB
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i7-13700KF and GeForce RTX 4090 run Terraria well?

Yes, the Core i7-13700KF paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Terraria smoothly up to 4k achieving around 114 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 6804% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 1987% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Terraria?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1999 ($350 CPU (Rank #93 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Core i7-13700KF provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Terraria performance?

Your Core i7-13700KF is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Terraria performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Terraria?

Terraria does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Terraria?

Terraria requires at minimum a Pentium 4 (CPU) and GeForce FX 5900 (GPU) with 2.5 GB RAM and 200 MB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core 2 Duo and GeForce 9600 GT with 4 GB RAM. Your Core i7-13700KF and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Terraria FPS estimates for the Core i7-13700KF and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Terraria FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.