Rainbow Six SiegeFPS onCore i7-4850HQ&GeForce RTX 4090

Rainbow Six Siege

This tactical shooter uses the AnvilNext 2.0 engine and features procedural environmental destruction, which can be taxing on the CPU. The Vulkan API helps older hardware maintain performance by better utilizing available resources. Siege is sensitive to RAM speed and latency. The HD Texture Pack can push VRAM usage over 6GB, so cards with 8GB or more are recommended for the best visual experience at 1080p or 1440p.

Rainbow Six Siege - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low72 FPS
medium53 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra36 FPS
1440P
low48 FPS
medium37 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra25 FPS
4K
low19 FPS
medium15 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra10 FPS

Performance Report

Rainbow Six Siege

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i7-4850HQ
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 36 to 72 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 25 to 48 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 10 to 19 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 611% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 670) for Rainbow Six Siege. The Core i7-4850HQ is 7% below recommended, but 172% above minimum.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4090 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Core i7-4850HQ still has additional frame-generation headroom.

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i7-4850HQ|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k medium, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 23 FPS, while the Core i7-4850HQ has headroom up to 119 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 81% (FPS gap: 96 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Core i7-4850HQ frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 26%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 41%
HighGPU Limits CPU 48%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 61%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 55%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 65%
HighGPU Limits CPU 69%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 77%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 76%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 81%
HighGPU Limits CPU 80%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 80%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i7-4850HQ and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU69% - 79%
<>
GPU47% - 67%
<>
Medium
CPU69% - 79%
<>
GPU47% - 67%
<>
High
CPU38% - 55%
<>
GPU69% - 83%
<>
Ultra
CPU38% - 55%
<>
GPU69% - 83%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU69% - 69%
GPU47% - 65%
<>
Medium
CPU69% - 69%
GPU47% - 65%
<>
High
CPU21% - 46%
<>
GPU69% - 83%
<>
Ultra
CPU21% - 46%
<>
GPU69% - 83%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU69% - 69%
GPU47% - 65%
<>
Medium
CPU69% - 69%
GPU47% - 65%
<>
High
CPU21% - 46%
<>
GPU69% - 83%
<>
Ultra
CPU21% - 46%
<>
GPU69% - 83%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i7-4850HQ + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 21% and 79% and GPU utilization between 47% and 83%. Core i7-4850HQ stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 67% at 1080p to 66% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 60% to 52%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 76% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i7-4850HQ peaks at 74% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 60% and GPU 67%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 52% and GPU 66%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 52% and GPU 66%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 46% (38-55%) and GPU 76% (69-83%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i7-4850HQ remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i7-4850HQ and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Rainbow Six Siege Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i7-4850HQ
cpu icon
6,139
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-560
RecommendedCore i5-2500K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 460
RecommendedGeForce GTX 670

Your CPU is 7% below recommended and your GPU is 611% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

-7%vsrecommended

GPU

+611%vsrecommended

CPU

+172%vsminimum

GPU

+1575%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 460
Processor: Core i3-560
Memory: 6 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 670
Processor: Core i5-2500K
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i7-4850HQ and GeForce RTX 4090 run Rainbow Six Siege well?

The Core i7-4850HQ and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Rainbow Six Siege at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 36 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Rainbow Six Siege?

Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Rainbow Six Siege performance?

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Rainbow Six Siege performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege requires at minimum a Core i3-560 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 460 (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 61 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-2500K and GeForce GTX 670 with 8 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Rainbow Six Siege FPS estimates for the Core i7-4850HQ and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Rainbow Six Siege FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.