The lighting engine has been updated over the years. It scales well, but running at 'Ultra' settings with high scaling can challenge even modern GPUs.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 156 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 149 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 131 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 227% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1660) for Euro Truck Simulator 2. The Core i9-10900F is 12% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600).
The Core i9-10900F sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $1949. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 156 FPS, equivalent to 0.08 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.128 fps/$ | 0.109 fps/$ | 0.093 fps/$ | 0.080 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.116 fps/$ | 0.102 fps/$ | 0.086 fps/$ | 0.076 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.105 fps/$ | 0.094 fps/$ | 0.083 fps/$ | 0.067 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p ultra, the Core i9-10900F sets the ceiling at about 150 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 277 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 46% (FPS gap: 127 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Core i9-10900F is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 36% | CPU Limits GPU 39% | CPU Limits GPU 42% | CPU Limits GPU 46% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 38% | CPU Limits GPU 40% | CPU Limits GPU 44% | CPU Limits GPU 43% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 32% | CPU Limits GPU 32% | CPU Limits GPU 37% | CPU Limits GPU 33% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU17% - 34% <> GPU52% - 69% <> | CPU17% - 34% <> GPU52% - 69% <> | CPU13% - 33% <> GPU84% - 88% <> | CPU13% - 33% <> GPU84% - 88% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU19% - 35% <> GPU54% - 71% <> | CPU19% - 35% <> GPU54% - 71% <> | CPU15% - 34% <> GPU86% - 93% <> | CPU15% - 34% <> GPU86% - 93% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU19% - 35% <> GPU54% - 71% <> | CPU19% - 35% <> GPU54% - 71% <> | CPU15% - 34% <> GPU86% - 93% <> | CPU15% - 34% <> GPU86% - 93% <> |
The Core i9-10900F + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 13% and 35% and GPU utilization between 52% and 93%. Core i9-10900F keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 73% at 1080p to 76% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 25% to 26%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 90% usage (86-93%), while the Core i9-10900F stays at 24% (15-34%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 25% and GPU 73%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 26% and GPU 76%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 26% and GPU 76%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 23% (13-33%) and GPU 86% (84-88%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i9-10900F remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i9-10900F and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 12% above and your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+12%vsrecommended
+227%vsrecommended
+209%vsminimum
+830%vsminimum
Yes, the Core i9-10900F paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Euro Truck Simulator 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 131 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 12% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1949 ($300 CPU (Rank #294 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).
For Euro Truck Simulator 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i9-10900F is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-6400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600 and GeForce GTX 1660 with 12 GB RAM. Your Core i9-10900F and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
