Baldur's Gate 3FPS onCore i9-11900KF&GeForce RTX 4090

Baldur's Gate 3

A dense RPG where Act 3 becomes a CPU stress test due to the high number of NPCs. An SSD is vital for loading times. 16GB of RAM is recommended, and the game benefits greatly from upscaling tech like DLSS and FSR.

Baldur's Gate 3 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low193 FPS
medium173 FPS
high143 FPS
ultra125 FPS
1440P
low140 FPS
medium122 FPS
high104 FPS
ultra94 FPS
4K
low95 FPS
medium82 FPS
high69 FPS
ultra58 FPS

Performance Report

Baldur's Gate 3

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i9-11900KF
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 125 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 94 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 58 to 95 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 131% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060 Super) for Baldur's Gate 3. The Core i9-11900KF is 39% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-8700K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i9-11900KF sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, 1440p ultra, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1440p (low/medium/high), all 4k settings.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i9-11900KF:$349(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $513

Combo price: $1998. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 125 FPS, equivalent to 0.06 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.097 fps/$0.087 fps/$0.072 fps/$0.063 fps/$
1440p0.070 fps/$0.061 fps/$0.052 fps/$0.047 fps/$
4k0.048 fps/$0.041 fps/$0.035 fps/$0.029 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i9-11900KF|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p ultra, the Core i9-11900KF sets the ceiling at about 126 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 174 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 28% (FPS gap: 48 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 5/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 7/12.

Verdict

Well Balanced

The Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 25%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 22%
HighCPU Limits GPU 26%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 28%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraCPU Limits GPU 10%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU73% - 100%
<>
GPU40% - 90%
<>
Medium
CPU68% - 100%
<>
GPU46% - 89%
<>
High
CPU49% - 100%
<>
GPU51% - 94%
<>
Ultra
CPU48% - 100%
<>
GPU62% - 96%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU71% - 100%
<>
GPU40% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU67% - 100%
<>
GPU45% - 92%
<>
High
CPU47% - 100%
<>
GPU50% - 97%
<>
Ultra
CPU46% - 100%
<>
GPU61% - 96%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU72% - 100%
<>
GPU41% - 95%
<>
Medium
CPU68% - 100%
<>
GPU45% - 93%
<>
High
CPU49% - 100%
<>
GPU50% - 98%
<>
Ultra
CPU49% - 100%
<>
GPU59% - 97%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i9-11900KF + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 46% and 100% and GPU utilization between 40% and 98%. Core i9-11900KF reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 71% at 1080p to 72% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 80% to 80%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the Core i9-11900KF reaches 86% average load (73-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 65% (40-90%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 80% and GPU 71%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 79% and GPU 72%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 80% and GPU 72%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 74% (48-100%) and GPU 79% (62-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i9-11900KF remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the CPU. The Core i9-11900KF reaches 86% average load at 1080p (Full HD) Low while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively underutilized, so a faster processor would improve frame-time consistency and top-end FPS.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Baldur's Gate 3 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i9-11900KF
cpu icon
24,585
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4690
RecommendedCore i7-8700K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 970
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060 Super

Your CPU is 39% above and your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+39%vsrecommended

GPU

+131%vsrecommended

CPU

+314%vsminimum

GPU

+295%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-4690
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Processor: Core i7-8700K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 run Baldur's Gate 3 well?

Yes, the Core i9-11900KF paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Baldur's Gate 3 smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 94 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 39% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Baldur's Gate 3?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1998 ($349 CPU (Rank #279 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Baldur's Gate 3 performance?

For Baldur's Gate 3, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i9-11900KF is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Baldur's Gate 3?

Baldur's Gate 3 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Baldur's Gate 3?

Baldur's Gate 3 requires at minimum a Core i5-4690 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 150 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-8700K and GeForce RTX 2060 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Baldur's Gate 3 FPS estimates for the Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Baldur's Gate 3 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.