Rainbow Six SiegeFPS onCore i9-11900KF&GeForce RTX 4090

Rainbow Six Siege

This tactical shooter uses the AnvilNext 2.0 engine and features procedural environmental destruction, which can be taxing on the CPU. The Vulkan API helps older hardware maintain performance by better utilizing available resources. Siege is sensitive to RAM speed and latency. The HD Texture Pack can push VRAM usage over 6GB, so cards with 8GB or more are recommended for the best visual experience at 1080p or 1440p.

Rainbow Six Siege - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low615 FPS
medium547 FPS
high474 FPS
ultra391 FPS
1440P
low499 FPS
medium431 FPS
high410 FPS
ultra332 FPS
4K
low335 FPS
medium312 FPS
high267 FPS
ultra221 FPS

Performance Report

Rainbow Six Siege

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i9-11900KF
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 391 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 332 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 221 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 611% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 670) for Rainbow Six Siege. The Core i9-11900KF is 273% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-2500K).

⚙️Bottleneck Analysis

The Core i9-11900KF determines the performance ceiling at 1080p (low/medium/ultra), all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GPU has headroom. The system is well balanced at 1080p high.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i9-11900KF:$349(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $513

Combo price: $1998. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 391 FPS, equivalent to 0.2 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.308 fps/$0.274 fps/$0.237 fps/$0.196 fps/$
1440p0.250 fps/$0.216 fps/$0.205 fps/$0.166 fps/$
4k0.168 fps/$0.156 fps/$0.134 fps/$0.111 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i9-11900KF|GeForce RTX 4090
📈Analysis

At 1440p medium, the Core i9-11900KF sets the ceiling at about 422 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 593 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 29% (FPS gap: 171 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 11/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 1/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i9-11900KF is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 12%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 10%
HighBalanced
UltraCPU Limits GPU 12%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 25%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 29%
HighCPU Limits GPU 19%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 26%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 24%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 21%
HighCPU Limits GPU 27%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 29%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU94% - 100%
<>
GPU21% - 37%
<>
Medium
CPU94% - 100%
<>
GPU21% - 37%
<>
High
CPU40% - 68%
<>
GPU77% - 77%
Ultra
CPU40% - 68%
<>
GPU77% - 77%

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU92% - 93%
<>
GPU23% - 43%
<>
Medium
CPU92% - 93%
<>
GPU23% - 43%
<>
High
CPU22% - 68%
<>
GPU76% - 80%
<>
Ultra
CPU22% - 68%
<>
GPU76% - 80%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU92% - 93%
<>
GPU23% - 43%
<>
Medium
CPU92% - 93%
<>
GPU23% - 43%
<>
High
CPU22% - 68%
<>
GPU76% - 80%
<>
Ultra
CPU22% - 68%
<>
GPU76% - 80%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i9-11900KF + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 22% and 100% and GPU utilization between 21% and 80%. Core i9-11900KF reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 53% at 1080p to 56% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 76% to 69%.

Bottleneck Analysis

This profile is CPU-bound. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the Core i9-11900KF reaches 97% average load (94-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 29% (21-37%), which points to CPU-side frame preparation limits.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 76% and GPU 53%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 69% and GPU 56%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 69% and GPU 56%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 45% (22-68%) and GPU 78% (76-80%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i9-11900KF remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the CPU. The Core i9-11900KF reaches 97% average load at 1080p (Full HD) Low while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively underutilized, so a faster processor would improve frame-time consistency and top-end FPS.

Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.

  • The Ideal Scenario (GPU Bottleneck): You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage. This indicates your system is successfully pushing out graphics as fast as it can, without being held back by the CPU.
  • CPU Bottleneck: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the CPU is struggling to compute game logic and prepare frames fast enough. The GPU sits waiting, often resulting in stuttering, inconsistent frame times, and lower overall FPS.
  • Engine Limits or Capped FPS: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Rainbow Six Siege Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i9-11900KF
cpu icon
24,585
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-560
RecommendedCore i5-2500K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 460
RecommendedGeForce GTX 670

Your CPU is 273% above and your GPU is 611% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+273%vsrecommended

GPU

+611%vsrecommended

CPU

+987%vsminimum

GPU

+1575%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 460
Processor: Core i3-560
Memory: 6 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 670
Processor: Core i5-2500K
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 run Rainbow Six Siege well?

Yes, the Core i9-11900KF paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Rainbow Six Siege smoothly up to 4k achieving around 221 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 611% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 273% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Rainbow Six Siege?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1998 ($349 CPU (Rank #279 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Rainbow Six Siege performance?

For Rainbow Six Siege, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i9-11900KF is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege requires at minimum a Core i3-560 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 460 (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 61 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-2500K and GeForce GTX 670 with 8 GB RAM. Your Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Rainbow Six Siege FPS estimates for the Core i9-11900KF and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Rainbow Six Siege FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.