StarfieldFPS onCore i9-12900TE&GeForce RTX 4090

Starfield

Bethesda's Creation Engine 2 is CPU-dependent, especially in cities, and requires an SSD for asset streaming. Optimization tends to favor AMD slightly, but generally requires powerful hardware to run smoothly.

Starfield - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low128 FPS
medium109 FPS
high95 FPS
ultra73 FPS
1440P
low118 FPS
medium99 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra64 FPS
4K
low55 FPS
medium47 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra34 FPS

Performance Report

Starfield

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i9-12900TE
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 73 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 64 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 34 to 55 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 52% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2080) for Starfield. The Core i9-12900TE is 26% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10600K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i9-12900TE sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p low, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (medium/high/ultra), all 1440p settings.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i9-12900TE:$664(updated 2/9/2026)
Official Launch Price: $494

Combo price: $2313. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 73 FPS, equivalent to 0.03 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.055 fps/$0.047 fps/$0.041 fps/$0.032 fps/$
1440p0.051 fps/$0.043 fps/$0.037 fps/$0.028 fps/$
4k0.024 fps/$0.020 fps/$0.018 fps/$0.015 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i9-12900TE|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k medium, the Core i9-12900TE sets the ceiling at about 51 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 82 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 38% (FPS gap: 31 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 5/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 7/12.

Verdict

Well Balanced

The Core i9-12900TE and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 7%
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 37%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 38%
HighCPU Limits GPU 34%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 32%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i9-12900TE and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU55% - 74%
<>
GPU52% - 73%
<>
Medium
CPU53% - 74%
<>
GPU84% - 95%
<>
High
CPU54% - 74%
<>
GPU87% - 98%
<>
Ultra
CPU55% - 76%
<>
GPU88% - 98%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU49% - 70%
<>
GPU75% - 87%
<>
Medium
CPU49% - 70%
<>
GPU90% - 97%
<>
High
CPU47% - 70%
<>
GPU92% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU46% - 63%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU41% - 70%
<>
GPU75% - 88%
<>
Medium
CPU41% - 69%
<>
GPU94% - 98%
<>
High
CPU38% - 69%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU36% - 60%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i9-12900TE + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 36% and 76% and GPU utilization between 52% and 100%. Core i9-12900TE stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 84% at 1080p to 94% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 65% to 53%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (97-100%), while the Core i9-12900TE stays at 54% (38-69%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 65% and GPU 84%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 58% and GPU 92%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 53% and GPU 94%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 64% (53-74%) and GPU 90% (84-95%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i9-12900TE remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) High while the Core i9-12900TE still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Starfield Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i9-12900TE
cpu icon
22,887
Your Score
MinimumCore i7-6800K
RecommendedCore i5-10600K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2080

Your CPU is 26% above and your GPU is 52% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+26%vsrecommended

GPU

+52%vsrecommended

CPU

+65%vsminimum

GPU

+160%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i7-6800K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório)
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2080
Processor: Core i5-10600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório)
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i9-12900TE and GeForce RTX 4090 run Starfield well?

Yes, the Core i9-12900TE paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Starfield smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 64 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 52% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 26% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Starfield?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2313 ($664 CPU (Rank #378 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Core i9-12900TE is currently the main performance bottleneck and its market value ($664) is actually higher than newer, faster alternatives. Trading it or upgrading could yield immediate profit and performance gains. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Starfield performance?

For Starfield, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i9-12900TE is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Starfield?

Starfield does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Starfield?

Starfield requires at minimum a Core i7-6800K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600K and GeForce RTX 2080 with 16 GB RAM. Your Core i9-12900TE and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Starfield FPS estimates for the Core i9-12900TE and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Starfield FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.