Rainbow Six SiegeFPS onCore i9-13900KF&GeForce RTX 4090

Rainbow Six Siege

This tactical shooter uses the AnvilNext 2.0 engine and features procedural environmental destruction, which can be taxing on the CPU. The Vulkan API helps older hardware maintain performance by better utilizing available resources. Siege is sensitive to RAM speed and latency. The HD Texture Pack can push VRAM usage over 6GB, so cards with 8GB or more are recommended for the best visual experience at 1080p or 1440p.

Rainbow Six Siege - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low700 FPS
medium600 FPS
high500 FPS
ultra450 FPS
1440P
low700 FPS
medium600 FPS
high500 FPS
ultra450 FPS
4K
low504 FPS
medium475 FPS
high430 FPS
ultra333 FPS

Performance Report

Rainbow Six Siege

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i9-13900KF
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 450 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 450 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 333 FPS.

✅Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 611% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 670) for Rainbow Six Siege. The Core i9-13900KF is 776% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-2500K).

✅FPS Ceiling Analysis

No major FPS-ceiling mismatch detected. The GeForce RTX 4090 and Core i9-13900KF stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across the tested resolutions and quality settings.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i9-13900KF:$480(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $599

Combo price: $2129. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 450 FPS, equivalent to 0.21 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.329 fps/$0.282 fps/$0.235 fps/$0.211 fps/$
1440p0.329 fps/$0.282 fps/$0.235 fps/$0.211 fps/$
4k0.237 fps/$0.223 fps/$0.202 fps/$0.156 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i9-13900KF|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

This CPU/GPU pair is mostly balanced in Rainbow Six Siege. Across tested presets: GPU limits in 0/12, CPU limits in 0/12, and balanced in 12/12. Peak observed performance in the sampled cells is around 700 FPS.

✅Verdict

Well Balanced

The Core i9-13900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i9-13900KF and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU74% - 93%
<>
GPU27% - 43%
<>
Medium
CPU74% - 93%
<>
GPU27% - 43%
<>
High
CPU36% - 37%
<>
GPU76% - 81%
<>
Ultra
CPU36% - 37%
<>
GPU76% - 81%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU29% - 45%
<>
Medium
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU29% - 45%
<>
High
CPU15% - 26%
<>
GPU79% - 82%
<>
Ultra
CPU15% - 26%
<>
GPU79% - 82%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU29% - 45%
<>
Medium
CPU73% - 75%
<>
GPU29% - 45%
<>
High
CPU15% - 26%
<>
GPU79% - 82%
<>
Ultra
CPU15% - 26%
<>
GPU79% - 82%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i9-13900KF + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 15% and 93% and GPU utilization between 27% and 82%. Core i9-13900KF stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 57% at 1080p to 59% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 60% to 47%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 80% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i9-13900KF peaks at 84% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 60% and GPU 57%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 47% and GPU 59%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 47% and GPU 59%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 20% (15-26%) and GPU 80% (79-82%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i9-13900KF remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i9-13900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Rainbow Six Siege Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i9-13900KF
cpu icon
57,743
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-560
RecommendedCore i5-2500K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 460
RecommendedGeForce GTX 670

Your CPU is 776% above and your GPU is 611% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+776%vsrecommended

GPU

+611%vsrecommended

CPU

+2454%vsminimum

GPU

+1575%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 460
Processor: Core i3-560
Memory: 6 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 670
Processor: Core i5-2500K
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i9-13900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 run Rainbow Six Siege well?

Yes, the Core i9-13900KF paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Rainbow Six Siege smoothly up to 4k achieving around 333 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 611% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 776% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Rainbow Six Siege?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2129 ($480 CPU (Rank #129 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). This is a well-balanced setup, meaning you're getting good value from both components without significant waste.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Rainbow Six Siege performance?

This setup is already well-balanced for Rainbow Six Siege. No significant bottleneck - CPU and GPU are well matched across all settings. Both the Core i9-13900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 complement each other effectively, so upgrading either component individually would yield diminishing returns. If you want more FPS, you'd benefit most from upgrading both CPU and GPU together.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege requires at minimum a Core i3-560 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 460 (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 61 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-2500K and GeForce GTX 670 with 8 GB RAM. Your Core i9-13900KF and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Rainbow Six Siege FPS estimates for the Core i9-13900KF and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Rainbow Six Siege FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.