Delta ForceFPS onCore Ultra 5 225F&GeForce RTX 4090

Delta Force

Returning to compete with Battlefield, Delta Force uses a modern engine featuring environmental destruction. While minimum requirements are accessible (GTX 960), competitive settings scale up to require GTX 10/RTX 20 series GPUs and 16GB of RAM for the best experience.

Delta Force - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low311 FPS
medium269 FPS
high252 FPS
ultra242 FPS
1440P
low234 FPS
medium209 FPS
high195 FPS
ultra174 FPS
4K
low157 FPS
medium134 FPS
high118 FPS
ultra94 FPS

Performance Report

Delta Force

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core Ultra 5 225F
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 242 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 174 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 94 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 315% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) for Delta Force. The Core Ultra 5 225F is 248% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-6500).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 225F sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, 4k (medium/high/ultra), while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 4k low.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core Ultra 5 225F:$150(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $231

Combo price: $1799. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 242 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.173 fps/$0.150 fps/$0.140 fps/$0.135 fps/$
1440p0.130 fps/$0.116 fps/$0.108 fps/$0.097 fps/$
4k0.087 fps/$0.074 fps/$0.066 fps/$0.052 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core Ultra 5 225F|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p medium, the Core Ultra 5 225F sets the ceiling at about 271 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 341 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 21% (FPS gap: 70 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 11/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 1/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core Ultra 5 225F is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 14%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 21%
HighCPU Limits GPU 20%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 12%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 9%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 17%
HighCPU Limits GPU 13%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 9%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumCPU Limits GPU 14%
HighCPU Limits GPU 12%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 10%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core Ultra 5 225F and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU76% - 90%
<>
GPU58% - 75%
<>
Medium
CPU76% - 90%
<>
GPU58% - 75%
<>
High
CPU72% - 91%
<>
GPU61% - 78%
<>
Ultra
CPU74% - 91%
<>
GPU61% - 78%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU49% - 62%
<>
GPU92% - 96%
<>
Medium
CPU49% - 62%
<>
GPU92% - 96%
<>
High
CPU46% - 63%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU48% - 64%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU40% - 44%
<>
GPU95% - 97%
<>
Medium
CPU40% - 44%
<>
GPU95% - 97%
<>
High
CPU39% - 41%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU41% - 41%
GPU98% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core Ultra 5 225F + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 39% and 91% and GPU utilization between 58% and 100%. Core Ultra 5 225F stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 68% at 1080p to 98% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 83% to 41%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 99% usage (98-100%), while the Core Ultra 5 225F stays at 40% (39-41%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 83% and GPU 68%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 56% and GPU 96%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 41% and GPU 98%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 56% (49-62%) and GPU 94% (92-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core Ultra 5 225F remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core Ultra 5 225F and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Delta Force Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core Ultra 5 225F
cpu icon
31,541
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-4150
RecommendedCore i5-6500
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 960
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1060 5GB

Your CPU is 248% above and your GPU is 315% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+248%vsrecommended

GPU

+315%vsrecommended

CPU

+662%vsminimum

GPU

+521%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 960
Processor: Core i3-4150
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 50 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Processor: Core i5-6500
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 50 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core Ultra 5 225F and GeForce RTX 4090 run Delta Force well?

Yes, the Core Ultra 5 225F paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Delta Force smoothly up to 4k achieving around 94 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 315% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 248% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Delta Force?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1799 ($150 CPU (Rank #16 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your build is already very cost-efficient, but if you want even more FPS, the next good option is upgrading the CPU. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Delta Force performance?

For Delta Force, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core Ultra 5 225F is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Delta Force?

Delta Force does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Delta Force?

Delta Force requires at minimum a Core i3-4150 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 50 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-6500 and GeForce GTX 1060 5GB with 16 GB RAM. Your Core Ultra 5 225F and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Delta Force FPS estimates for the Core Ultra 5 225F and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Delta Force FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.