The transition from Global Offensive to Counter-Strike 2 marked the end of the DX9 era for Valve. The new Source 2 engine introduces physically based rendering and dynamic smoke that interacts with lighting, significantly changing the performance profile. While CS:GO was light on the GPU, CS2 requires a competent card to handle these effects without stuttering. It remains CPU-heavy at competitive settings, where the 'sub-tick' server architecture demands strong single-thread performance. CPUs with large L3 caches, like AMD's X3D line, offer a major advantage. 8GB of RAM is now the absolute minimum, though more is recommended to avoid hitches.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 367 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 325 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 256 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Counter-Strike 2. The Core Ultra 5 245KF is 149% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-9700K).
The Core Ultra 5 245KF sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $1838. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 367 FPS, equivalent to 0.2 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.283 fps/$ | 0.256 fps/$ | 0.209 fps/$ | 0.200 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.263 fps/$ | 0.230 fps/$ | 0.197 fps/$ | 0.177 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.196 fps/$ | 0.182 fps/$ | 0.157 fps/$ | 0.139 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the Core Ultra 5 245KF sets the ceiling at about 516 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 700 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 26% (FPS gap: 184 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Core Ultra 5 245KF is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 26% | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 18% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 24% | CPU Limits GPU 20% | CPU Limits GPU 19% | CPU Limits GPU 13% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 15% | CPU Limits GPU 15% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 10% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU50% - 79% <> GPU19% - 38% <> | CPU45% - 73% <> GPU23% - 48% <> | CPU39% - 70% <> GPU20% - 49% <> | CPU37% - 59% <> GPU22% - 51% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU63% - 75% <> GPU49% - 60% <> | CPU57% - 71% <> GPU69% - 85% <> | CPU50% - 67% <> GPU71% - 87% <> | CPU44% - 59% <> GPU72% - 88% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU48% - 66% <> GPU52% - 89% <> | CPU43% - 61% <> GPU87% - 99% <> | CPU38% - 59% <> GPU89% - 100% <> | CPU35% - 58% <> GPU90% - 100% <> |
The Core Ultra 5 245KF + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 35% and 79% and GPU utilization between 19% and 100%. Core Ultra 5 245KF stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 34% at 1080p to 88% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 56% to 51%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 95% usage (90-100%), while the Core Ultra 5 245KF stays at 46% (35-58%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 56% and GPU 34%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 61% and GPU 73%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 51% and GPU 88%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.
4K (Ultra HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 52% (43-61%) and GPU 93% (87-99%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core Ultra 5 245KF remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 95% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Core Ultra 5 245KF still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 149% above and your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+149%vsrecommended
+136%vsrecommended
+1606%vsminimum
+843%vsminimum
Yes, the Core Ultra 5 245KF paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Counter-Strike 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 256 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 149% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1838 ($189 CPU (Rank #10 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Core Ultra 5 245KF provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).
Your Core Ultra 5 245KF is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Counter-Strike 2 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Counter-Strike 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Counter-Strike 2 requires at minimum a Core i5 750 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 85 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-9700K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your Core Ultra 5 245KF and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Counter-Strike 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
