Bethesda's Creation Engine 2 is CPU-dependent, especially in cities, and requires an SSD for asset streaming. Optimization tends to favor AMD slightly, but generally requires powerful hardware to run smoothly.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 86 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 66 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 41 to 80 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 52% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2080) for Starfield. The Core Ultra 7 265HX is 170% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10600K).
At lower resolutions (4k (medium/high/ultra)), the Core Ultra 7 265HX sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings), the GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 4k low.
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p high, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 112 FPS, while the Core Ultra 7 265HX has headroom up to 149 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 25% (FPS gap: 37 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 8/12 cells, CPU limits 3/12, balanced 1/12.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Core Ultra 7 265HX frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | GPU Limits CPU 23% | GPU Limits CPU 24% | GPU Limits CPU 25% | GPU Limits CPU 20% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 14% | GPU Limits CPU 13% | GPU Limits CPU 17% | GPU Limits CPU 14% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 19% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU57% - 70% <> GPU56% - 83% <> | CPU53% - 71% <> GPU77% - 95% <> | CPU50% - 71% <> GPU80% - 97% <> | CPU50% - 72% <> GPU81% - 96% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU45% - 60% <> GPU85% - 90% <> | CPU45% - 60% <> GPU90% - 97% <> | CPU44% - 59% <> GPU92% - 99% <> | CPU42% - 62% <> GPU93% - 99% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU33% - 58% <> GPU85% - 92% <> | CPU33% - 57% <> GPU94% - 98% <> | CPU33% - 57% <> GPU97% - 100% <> | CPU32% - 56% <> GPU97% - 99% <> |
The Core Ultra 7 265HX + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 32% and 72% and GPU utilization between 56% and 100%. Core Ultra 7 265HX stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 83% at 1080p to 95% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 62% to 45%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (97-100%), while the Core Ultra 7 265HX stays at 45% (33-57%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 62% and GPU 83%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 52% and GPU 94%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 45% and GPU 95%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 60% (50-71%) and GPU 88% (80-97%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core Ultra 7 265HX remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) High while the Core Ultra 7 265HX still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 170% above and your GPU is 52% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+170%vsrecommended
+52%vsrecommended
+253%vsminimum
+160%vsminimum
Yes, the Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Starfield smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 66 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 52% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 170% above the recommended requirements.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Starfield performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra. CPU fully utilized at: 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Starfield does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Starfield requires at minimum a Core i7-6800K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600K and GeForce RTX 2080 with 16 GB RAM. Your Core Ultra 7 265HX and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Starfield FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
