This 'Pokémon with guns' survival game runs on Unreal Engine. It is CPU-heavy due to AI simulation for the many creatures. Memory leaks can occur in long sessions, making 16GB of RAM a practical minimum.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 145 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 123 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 80 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Palworld. The Core Ultra 7 265KF is 162% above the recommended CPU (Core i9-9900K).
The Core Ultra 7 265KF sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, 1440p (medium/high/ultra), 4k (medium/high/ultra), while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1440p low, 4k low.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $1972. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 145 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.125 fps/$ | 0.110 fps/$ | 0.087 fps/$ | 0.074 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.096 fps/$ | 0.087 fps/$ | 0.072 fps/$ | 0.062 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.068 fps/$ | 0.063 fps/$ | 0.054 fps/$ | 0.041 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p ultra, the Core Ultra 7 265KF sets the ceiling at about 135 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 168 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 20% (FPS gap: 33 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 10/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 2/12.
Your Core Ultra 7 265KF is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 9% | CPU Limits GPU 18% | CPU Limits GPU 18% | CPU Limits GPU 20% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 12% | CPU Limits GPU 14% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 9% | CPU Limits GPU 8% | CPU Limits GPU 10% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU34% - 46% <> GPU79% - 89% <> | CPU20% - 36% <> GPU80% - 98% <> | CPU23% - 44% <> GPU83% - 100% <> | CPU24% - 40% <> GPU81% - 100% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU31% - 39% <> GPU86% - 89% <> | CPU16% - 37% <> GPU88% - 98% <> | CPU17% - 40% <> GPU92% - 100% <> | CPU17% - 35% <> GPU91% - 100% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU28% - 34% <> GPU89% - 92% <> | CPU13% - 32% <> GPU94% - 98% <> | CPU13% - 35% <> GPU98% - 100% <> | CPU14% - 35% <> GPU97% - 100% <> |
The Core Ultra 7 265KF + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 13% and 46% and GPU utilization between 79% and 100%. Core Ultra 7 265KF keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 89% at 1080p to 96% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 34% to 25%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 99% usage (98-100%), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF stays at 24% (13-35%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 34% and GPU 89%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 29% and GPU 93%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 25% and GPU 96%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 35% (31-39%) and GPU 88% (86-89%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core Ultra 7 265KF remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 99% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) High while the Core Ultra 7 265KF still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 162% above and your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+162%vsrecommended
+136%vsrecommended
+659%vsminimum
+657%vsminimum
Yes, the Core Ultra 7 265KF paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Palworld smoothly up to 4k achieving around 80 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 162% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1972 ($323 CPU (Rank #28 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Core Ultra 7 265KF provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is a great upgrade option for around $2499 (Rank #354 for value).
Your Core Ultra 7 265KF is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Palworld performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Palworld does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Palworld requires at minimum a Core i5-3570K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 40 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i9-9900K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 32 GB RAM. Your Core Ultra 7 265KF and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Palworld FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
