Counter-Strike 2FPS onEPYC 4464P&GeForce RTX 4090

Counter-Strike 2

The transition from Global Offensive to Counter-Strike 2 marked the end of the DX9 era for Valve. The new Source 2 engine introduces physically based rendering and dynamic smoke that interacts with lighting, significantly changing the performance profile. While CS:GO was light on the GPU, CS2 requires a competent card to handle these effects without stuttering. It remains CPU-heavy at competitive settings, where the 'sub-tick' server architecture demands strong single-thread performance. CPUs with large L3 caches, like AMD's X3D line, offer a major advantage. 8GB of RAM is now the absolute minimum, though more is recommended to avoid hitches.

Counter-Strike 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low508 FPS
medium462 FPS
high380 FPS
ultra361 FPS
1440P
low471 FPS
medium420 FPS
high361 FPS
ultra319 FPS
4K
low350 FPS
medium333 FPS
high285 FPS
ultra255 FPS

Performance Report

Counter-Strike 2

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 4464P
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 361 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 319 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 255 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Counter-Strike 2. The EPYC 4464P is 170% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-9700K).

⚙️Bottleneck Analysis

The EPYC 4464P determines the performance ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GPU has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 4464P:$450(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $429

Combo price: $2099. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 361 FPS, equivalent to 0.17 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.242 fps/$0.220 fps/$0.181 fps/$0.172 fps/$
1440p0.224 fps/$0.200 fps/$0.172 fps/$0.152 fps/$
4k0.167 fps/$0.159 fps/$0.136 fps/$0.121 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 4464P|GeForce RTX 4090
📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the EPYC 4464P sets the ceiling at about 503 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 700 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 28% (FPS gap: 197 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your EPYC 4464P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 28%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 24%
HighCPU Limits GPU 23%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 18%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 26%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 21%
HighCPU Limits GPU 21%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 16%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 19%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 17%
HighCPU Limits GPU 15%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 12%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU48% - 73%
<>
GPU18% - 38%
<>
Medium
CPU43% - 66%
<>
GPU22% - 47%
<>
High
CPU38% - 63%
<>
GPU19% - 49%
<>
Ultra
CPU36% - 54%
<>
GPU22% - 51%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU33% - 54%
<>
GPU48% - 56%
<>
Medium
CPU29% - 49%
<>
GPU65% - 84%
<>
High
CPU23% - 48%
<>
GPU67% - 86%
<>
Ultra
CPU20% - 41%
<>
GPU69% - 87%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU30% - 49%
<>
GPU51% - 87%
<>
Medium
CPU29% - 45%
<>
GPU86% - 97%
<>
High
CPU26% - 44%
<>
GPU87% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU25% - 43%
<>
GPU88% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 4464P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 20% and 73% and GPU utilization between 18% and 100%. EPYC 4464P stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the primary limiter at high visual load. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 33% at 1080p to 87% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 52% to 37%.

Bottleneck Analysis

This profile is GPU-bound. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 94% usage (87-100%), while the EPYC 4464P stays at 35% (26-44%), indicating the graphics pipeline is the limiting stage.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 52% and GPU 33%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 37% and GPU 70%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 37% and GPU 87%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 37% (29-45%) and GPU 92% (86-97%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 4464P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.

  • The Ideal Scenario (GPU Bottleneck): You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage. This indicates your system is successfully pushing out graphics as fast as it can, without being held back by the CPU.
  • CPU Bottleneck: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the CPU is struggling to compute game logic and prepare frames fast enough. The GPU sits waiting, often resulting in stuttering, inconsistent frame times, and lower overall FPS.
  • Engine Limits or Capped FPS: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Counter-Strike 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 4464P
cpu icon
47,185
Your Score
MinimumCore i5 750
RecommendedCore i7-9700K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 660
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070

Your CPU is 170% above and your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+170%vsrecommended

GPU

+136%vsrecommended

CPU

+1753%vsminimum

GPU

+843%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 660
Processor: Core i5 750
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 85 GB
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2070
Processor: Core i7-9700K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 85 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090 run Counter-Strike 2 well?

Yes, the EPYC 4464P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Counter-Strike 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 255 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 170% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Counter-Strike 2?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2099 ($450 CPU (Rank #62 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 4464P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 4585PX is a great upgrade option for around $699 (Rank #66 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Counter-Strike 2 performance?

Your EPYC 4464P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Counter-Strike 2 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Counter-Strike 2?

Counter-Strike 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Counter-Strike 2?

Counter-Strike 2 requires at minimum a Core i5 750 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 85 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-9700K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Counter-Strike 2 FPS estimates for the EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Counter-Strike 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.