The lighting engine has been updated over the years. It scales well, but running at 'Ultra' settings with high scaling can challenge even modern GPUs.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 274 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 227 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 173 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 227% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1660) for Euro Truck Simulator 2. The EPYC 4464P is 167% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600).
The EPYC 4464P sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2099. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 274 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.180 fps/$ | 0.155 fps/$ | 0.135 fps/$ | 0.131 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.148 fps/$ | 0.129 fps/$ | 0.111 fps/$ | 0.108 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.123 fps/$ | 0.110 fps/$ | 0.100 fps/$ | 0.082 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k high, the EPYC 4464P sets the ceiling at about 213 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 332 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 36% (FPS gap: 119 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your EPYC 4464P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 22% | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 26% | CPU Limits GPU 22% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 30% | CPU Limits GPU 31% | CPU Limits GPU 34% | CPU Limits GPU 29% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 32% | CPU Limits GPU 33% | CPU Limits GPU 36% | CPU Limits GPU 31% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU9% - 26% <> GPU59% - 78% <> | CPU9% - 26% <> GPU59% - 78% <> | CPU6% - 17% <> GPU58% - 79% <> | CPU6% - 17% <> GPU58% - 79% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU11% - 31% <> GPU53% - 77% <> | CPU11% - 31% <> GPU53% - 77% <> | CPU8% - 23% <> GPU53% - 78% <> | CPU8% - 23% <> GPU53% - 78% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU11% - 31% <> GPU53% - 77% <> | CPU11% - 31% <> GPU53% - 77% <> | CPU8% - 23% <> GPU53% - 78% <> | CPU8% - 23% <> GPU53% - 78% <> |
The EPYC 4464P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 6% and 31% and GPU utilization between 53% and 79%. EPYC 4464P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 68% at 1080p to 66% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 15% to 19%.
The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 68% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 4464P peaks at 21% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 15% and GPU 68%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 19% and GPU 66%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 19% and GPU 66%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.
1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 18% (9-26%) and GPU 68% (59-78%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 4464P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 167% above and your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+167%vsrecommended
+227%vsrecommended
+636%vsminimum
+830%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 4464P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Euro Truck Simulator 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 173 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 167% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2099 ($450 CPU (Rank #62 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 4464P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 4585PX is a great upgrade option for around $699 (Rank #66 for value).
Your EPYC 4464P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Euro Truck Simulator 2 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-6400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600 and GeForce GTX 1660 with 12 GB RAM. Your EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
