A masterpiece of the RAGE engine, heavily taxing the GPU with volumetric lighting and water physics. Interestingly, it has relatively low CPU utilization compared to its graphical demands. Be prepared for a massive 150GB install size.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 141 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 110 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 72 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Red Dead Redemption 2. The EPYC 4464P is 420% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-4770K).
The EPYC 4464P sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, 4k high, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 4k (low/medium/ultra).
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2099. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 141 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.102 fps/$ | 0.088 fps/$ | 0.079 fps/$ | 0.067 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.072 fps/$ | 0.064 fps/$ | 0.061 fps/$ | 0.052 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.051 fps/$ | 0.047 fps/$ | 0.040 fps/$ | 0.034 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the EPYC 4464P sets the ceiling at about 218 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 262 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 17% (FPS gap: 44 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 10/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 2/12.
Your EPYC 4464P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 17% | CPU Limits GPU 15% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 10% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 15% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 11% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 7% | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 10% | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU49% - 53% <> GPU42% - 64% <> | CPU45% - 50% <> GPU60% - 77% <> | CPU26% - 33% <> GPU59% - 76% <> | CPU18% - 31% <> GPU58% - 76% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU25% - 42% <> GPU68% - 83% <> | CPU22% - 40% <> GPU93% - 97% <> | CPU22% - 39% <> GPU92% - 97% <> | CPU19% - 35% <> GPU91% - 97% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU27% - 40% <> GPU70% - 86% <> | CPU27% - 40% <> GPU99% - 100% <> | CPU27% - 38% <> GPU99% - 100% <> | CPU17% - 30% <> GPU97% - 100% <> |
The EPYC 4464P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 17% and 53% and GPU utilization between 42% and 100%. EPYC 4464P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 64% at 1080p to 94% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 38% to 31%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Medium, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (99-100%), while the EPYC 4464P stays at 34% (27-40%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 38% and GPU 64%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 31% and GPU 90%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 31% and GPU 94%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 30% (22-39%) and GPU 94% (92-97%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 4464P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 100% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Medium while the EPYC 4464P still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 420% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+420%vsrecommended
+279%vsrecommended
+1039%vsminimum
+539%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 4464P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Red Dead Redemption 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 72 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 420% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2099 ($450 CPU (Rank #62 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 4464P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 4585PX is a great upgrade option for around $699 (Rank #66 for value).
Your EPYC 4464P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Red Dead Redemption 2 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k high.
Red Dead Redemption 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Red Dead Redemption 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-2500K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 770 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 150 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-4770K and GeForce GTX 1060 with 12 GB RAM. Your EPYC 4464P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
