Fortnite serves as a showcase for Unreal Engine 5. In 'Performance Mode', it runs on almost anything. However, enabling 'Lumen' (global illumination) and 'Nanite' (virtualized geometry) requires a powerful RTX 30/40 series GPU to maintain 60 FPS. The building mechanics also add a significant CPU load, especially in competitive end-games with dense player structures.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 192 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 149 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 80 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1080) for Fortnite. The EPYC 4484PX is 285% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-7300U).
The GeForce RTX 4090 sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p (medium/high), 1440p medium, 4k medium, while the EPYC 4484PX still has additional frame-generation headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (low/ultra), 1440p (low/high/ultra), 4k (low/high/ultra).
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2248. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 192 FPS, equivalent to 0.09 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.258 fps/$ | 0.188 fps/$ | 0.103 fps/$ | 0.085 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.173 fps/$ | 0.121 fps/$ | 0.090 fps/$ | 0.066 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.089 fps/$ | 0.060 fps/$ | 0.054 fps/$ | 0.036 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1440p medium, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 259 FPS, while the EPYC 4484PX has headroom up to 280 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 8% (FPS gap: 21 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 4/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 8/12. Confidence is low because both ceilings are very close in this cell.
The EPYC 4484PX and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 6% | GPU Limits CPU 7% | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 8% | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 6% | Balanced | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU86% - 100% <> GPU29% - 52% <> | CPU76% - 95% <> GPU74% - 76% <> | CPU27% - 57% <> GPU76% - 95% <> | CPU26% - 56% <> GPU76% - 95% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU75% - 80% <> GPU37% - 60% <> | CPU73% - 74% <> GPU75% - 90% <> | CPU21% - 48% <> GPU91% - 98% <> | CPU21% - 48% <> GPU91% - 98% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU75% - 81% <> GPU37% - 60% <> | CPU74% - 74% GPU75% - 95% <> | CPU21% - 42% <> GPU98% - 99% <> | CPU21% - 44% <> GPU97% - 99% <> |
The EPYC 4484PX + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 21% and 100% and GPU utilization between 29% and 99%. EPYC 4484PX reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 72% at 1080p to 82% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 66% to 54%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (98-99%), while the EPYC 4484PX stays at 32% (21-42%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 66% and GPU 72%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 55% and GPU 80%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 54% and GPU 82%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 42% (27-57%) and GPU 86% (76-95%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 4484PX remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Both components are stressed near their limits in the heaviest presets (EPYC 4484PX: 93% avg, GeForce RTX 4090: 98% avg). A targeted upgrade should follow your target resolution: GPU first for higher image quality, CPU first for higher minimum FPS.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 285% above and your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+285%vsrecommended
+136%vsrecommended
+689%vsminimum
+521%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 4484PX paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Fortnite smoothly up to 4k achieving around 80 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 285% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2248 ($599 CPU (Rank #73 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your GeForce RTX 4090 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Fortnite performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1440p medium, 4k medium.
Fortnite does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Fortnite requires at minimum a Core i3-3225 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 30 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-7300U and GeForce GTX 1080 with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 4484PX and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Fortnite FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
