Euro Truck Simulator 2FPS onEPYC 4565P&GeForce RTX 4090

Euro Truck Simulator 2

The lighting engine has been updated over the years. It scales well, but running at 'Ultra' settings with high scaling can challenge even modern GPUs.

Euro Truck Simulator 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low506 FPS
medium434 FPS
high392 FPS
ultra352 FPS
1440P
low443 FPS
medium385 FPS
high351 FPS
ultra315 FPS
4K
low373 FPS
medium333 FPS
high319 FPS
ultra244 FPS

Performance Report

Euro Truck Simulator 2

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 4565P
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 352 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 315 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 244 FPS.

✅Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 227% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1660) for Euro Truck Simulator 2. The EPYC 4565P is 262% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600).

✅FPS Ceiling Analysis

No major FPS-ceiling mismatch detected. The GeForce RTX 4090 and EPYC 4565P stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across the tested resolutions and quality settings.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 4565P:$1980(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $2730

Combo price: $3629. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 352 FPS, equivalent to 0.1 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.139 fps/$0.120 fps/$0.108 fps/$0.097 fps/$
1440p0.122 fps/$0.106 fps/$0.097 fps/$0.087 fps/$
4k0.103 fps/$0.092 fps/$0.088 fps/$0.067 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 4565P|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

This CPU/GPU pair is mostly balanced in Euro Truck Simulator 2. Across tested presets: GPU limits in 0/12, CPU limits in 0/12, and balanced in 12/12. Peak observed performance in the sampled cells is around 506 FPS.

✅Verdict

Well Balanced

The EPYC 4565P and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 4565P and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU9% - 26%
<>
GPU59% - 78%
<>
Medium
CPU9% - 26%
<>
GPU59% - 78%
<>
High
CPU6% - 17%
<>
GPU58% - 79%
<>
Ultra
CPU6% - 17%
<>
GPU58% - 79%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 77%
<>
Medium
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 77%
<>
High
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 78%
<>
Ultra
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 78%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 77%
<>
Medium
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 77%
<>
High
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 78%
<>
Ultra
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 78%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 4565P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 6% and 31% and GPU utilization between 53% and 79%. EPYC 4565P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 68% at 1080p to 66% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 15% to 19%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 68% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 4565P peaks at 21% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 15% and GPU 68%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 19% and GPU 66%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 19% and GPU 66%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 18% (9-26%) and GPU 68% (59-78%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 4565P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 4565P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Euro Truck Simulator 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 4565P
cpu icon
64,068
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-6400
RecommendedCore i5-9600
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 660
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1660

Your CPU is 262% above and your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+262%vsrecommended

GPU

+227%vsrecommended

CPU

+900%vsminimum

GPU

+830%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 660
Processor: Core i5-6400
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 25 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1660
Processor: Core i5-9600
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 25 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 4565P and GeForce RTX 4090 run Euro Truck Simulator 2 well?

Yes, the EPYC 4565P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Euro Truck Simulator 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 244 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 262% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Euro Truck Simulator 2?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $3629 ($1980 CPU (Rank #349 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). This is a well-balanced setup, meaning you're getting good value from both components without significant waste.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Euro Truck Simulator 2 performance?

This setup is already well-balanced for Euro Truck Simulator 2. No significant bottleneck - CPU and GPU are well matched across all settings. Both the EPYC 4565P and GeForce RTX 4090 complement each other effectively, so upgrading either component individually would yield diminishing returns. If you want more FPS, you'd benefit most from upgrading both CPU and GPU together.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Euro Truck Simulator 2?

Euro Truck Simulator 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Euro Truck Simulator 2?

Euro Truck Simulator 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-6400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600 and GeForce GTX 1660 with 12 GB RAM. Your EPYC 4565P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS estimates for the EPYC 4565P and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.