Naraka: BladepointFPS onEPYC 7282&GeForce RTX 4090

Naraka: Bladepoint

Unlike shooters, Naraka focuses on melee combat with fluid animations. The game is visually dense and supports DLSS, which is vital for high frame rates at resolutions above 1080p. An SSD is critical for map loading, and 16GB of RAM is recommended for smooth gameplay.

Naraka: Bladepoint - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low302 FPS
medium250 FPS
high224 FPS
ultra193 FPS
1440P
low200 FPS
medium177 FPS
high158 FPS
ultra128 FPS
4K
low89 FPS
medium77 FPS
high67 FPS
ultra57 FPS

Performance Report

Naraka: Bladepoint

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 7282
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 193 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 128 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 57 to 89 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Naraka: Bladepoint. The EPYC 7282 is 130% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-7700).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The EPYC 7282 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 7282:$199(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $650

Combo price: $1848. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 193 FPS, equivalent to 0.1 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.163 fps/$0.135 fps/$0.121 fps/$0.104 fps/$
1440p0.108 fps/$0.096 fps/$0.085 fps/$0.069 fps/$
4k0.048 fps/$0.042 fps/$0.036 fps/$0.031 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 7282|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k ultra, the EPYC 7282 sets the ceiling at about 57 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 118 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 52% (FPS gap: 61 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your EPYC 7282 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 37%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 39%
HighCPU Limits GPU 36%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 34%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 35%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 38%
HighCPU Limits GPU 36%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 34%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 51%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 50%
HighCPU Limits GPU 50%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 52%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 7282 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU77% - 96%
<>
GPU46% - 67%
<>
Medium
CPU77% - 96%
<>
GPU46% - 67%
<>
High
CPU40% - 63%
<>
GPU67% - 82%
<>
Ultra
CPU47% - 68%
<>
GPU67% - 82%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU76% - 93%
<>
GPU57% - 69%
<>
Medium
CPU76% - 93%
<>
GPU57% - 69%
<>
High
CPU39% - 61%
<>
GPU81% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU46% - 66%
<>
GPU81% - 85%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU75% - 84%
<>
GPU49% - 69%
<>
Medium
CPU75% - 84%
<>
GPU49% - 69%
<>
High
CPU36% - 51%
<>
GPU72% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU38% - 52%
<>
GPU71% - 85%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 7282 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 36% and 96% and GPU utilization between 46% and 85%. EPYC 7282 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 65% at 1080p to 69% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 71% to 62%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the EPYC 7282 reaches 86% average load (77-96%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 56% (46-67%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 71% and GPU 65%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 69% and GPU 73%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 62% and GPU 69%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 50% (39-61%) and GPU 83% (81-85%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 7282 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 7282 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Naraka: Bladepoint Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 7282
cpu icon
30,201
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4460
RecommendedCore i7-7700
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 750 Ti
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1060

Your CPU is 130% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+130%vsrecommended

GPU

+279%vsrecommended

CPU

+514%vsminimum

GPU

+877%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Processor: Core i5-4460
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1060
Processor: Core i7-7700
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 7282 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Naraka: Bladepoint well?

Yes, the EPYC 7282 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Naraka: Bladepoint smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 128 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 130% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Naraka: Bladepoint?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1848 ($199 CPU (Rank #232 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8454H is a great upgrade option for around $6540 (Rank #1 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Naraka: Bladepoint performance?

For Naraka: Bladepoint, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The EPYC 7282 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Naraka: Bladepoint?

Naraka: Bladepoint does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Naraka: Bladepoint?

Naraka: Bladepoint requires at minimum a Core i5-4460 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 20 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-7700 and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 7282 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Naraka: Bladepoint FPS estimates for the EPYC 7282 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Naraka: Bladepoint FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.