A popular competitive game featuring high-intensity action and tactical gameplay.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 87 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 127 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 70 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 535% above the recommended GPU (Unknown GPU) for Call of Duty: Warzone. The EPYC 7303P is 356% above the recommended CPU (Unknown CPU).
The EPYC 7303P sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2243. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 87 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.080 fps/$ | 0.067 fps/$ | 0.045 fps/$ | 0.039 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.086 fps/$ | 0.077 fps/$ | 0.064 fps/$ | 0.057 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.067 fps/$ | 0.060 fps/$ | 0.041 fps/$ | 0.031 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p high, the EPYC 7303P sets the ceiling at about 101 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 280 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 64% (FPS gap: 179 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your EPYC 7303P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 46% | CPU Limits GPU 53% | CPU Limits GPU 64% | CPU Limits GPU 64% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 37% | CPU Limits GPU 36% | CPU Limits GPU 38% | CPU Limits GPU 40% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 34% | CPU Limits GPU 32% | CPU Limits GPU 41% | CPU Limits GPU 43% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU81% - 93% <> GPU51% - 79% <> | CPU74% - 89% <> GPU66% - 95% <> | CPU49% - 82% <> GPU66% - 94% <> | CPU49% - 74% <> GPU67% - 94% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU75% - 76% <> GPU68% - 83% <> | CPU70% - 75% <> GPU97% - 99% <> | CPU48% - 65% <> GPU97% - 100% <> | CPU46% - 59% <> GPU98% - 99% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU72% - 73% <> GPU67% - 83% <> | CPU68% - 71% <> GPU95% - 99% <> | CPU34% - 45% <> GPU96% - 99% <> | CPU30% - 38% <> GPU96% - 99% <> |
The EPYC 7303P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 30% and 93% and GPU utilization between 51% and 100%. EPYC 7303P reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 76% at 1080p to 92% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 74% to 54%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the EPYC 7303P reaches 87% average load (81-93%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 65% (51-79%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 74% and GPU 76%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 64% and GPU 93%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 54% and GPU 92%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 66% (49-82%) and GPU 80% (66-94%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 7303P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Both components are stressed near their limits in the heaviest presets (EPYC 7303P: 87% avg, GeForce RTX 4090: 98% avg). A targeted upgrade should follow your target resolution: GPU first for higher image quality, CPU first for higher minimum FPS.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 356% above and your GPU is 535% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+356%vsrecommended
+535%vsrecommended
+1116%vsminimum
+3711%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 7303P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Call of Duty: Warzone smoothly up to 4k achieving around 70 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 535% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 356% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2243 ($594 CPU (Rank #153 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 7303P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8571N is a great upgrade option for around $599 (Rank #60 for value).
Your EPYC 7303P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Call of Duty: Warzone performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Call of Duty: Warzone does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Call of Duty: Warzone requires at minimum a Unknown CPU (CPU) and Unknown GPU (GPU) with 8GB RAM and Unknown storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Unknown CPU and Unknown GPU with 16GB RAM. Your EPYC 7303P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Call of Duty: Warzone FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
