This extraction shooter bets on visual fidelity with UE5 and DX12, requiring AVX2 support. It uses volumetric lighting and dense effects, with a recommended baseline of RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT, indicating it is a demanding title.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 173 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 164 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 115 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for ARC Raiders. The EPYC 7351P is 41% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600K).
The EPYC 7351P determines the performance ceiling at all 1080p settings, while the GPU has headroom. The system is well balanced at all 1440p settings, all 4k settings.
At 1080p ultra, the EPYC 7351P sets the ceiling at about 173 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 208 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 17% (FPS gap: 35 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 5/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 7/12.
The EPYC 7351P and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 15% | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 14% | CPU Limits GPU 17% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 7% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU34% - 50% <> GPU44% - 63% <> | CPU33% - 50% <> GPU49% - 66% <> | CPU33% - 49% <> GPU51% - 67% <> | CPU33% - 50% <> GPU53% - 67% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU29% - 50% <> GPU47% - 63% <> | CPU30% - 50% <> GPU52% - 67% <> | CPU29% - 49% <> GPU55% - 68% <> | CPU30% - 50% <> GPU56% - 68% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU21% - 36% <> GPU50% - 66% <> | CPU21% - 36% <> GPU55% - 70% <> | CPU20% - 35% <> GPU59% - 71% <> | CPU21% - 36% <> GPU61% - 71% <> |
The EPYC 7351P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 20% and 50% and GPU utilization between 44% and 71%. EPYC 7351P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 58% at 1080p to 63% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 42% to 28%.
The utilization pattern is relatively balanced. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 66% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 7351P peaks at 42% average, with no single component consistently acting as a hard bottleneck.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 42% and GPU 58%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 40% and GPU 60%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 28% and GPU 63%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 28% (21-36%) and GPU 66% (61-71%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 7351P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 7351P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 41% above and your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+41%vsrecommended
+136%vsrecommended
+103%vsminimum
+333%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 7351P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run ARC Raiders smoothly up to 4k achieving around 115 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 41% above the recommended requirements.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
For ARC Raiders, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The EPYC 7351P is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra.
ARC Raiders does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
ARC Raiders requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 35 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 7351P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These ARC Raiders FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
