PalworldFPS onEPYC 7663&GeForce RTX 4090

Palworld

This 'Pokémon with guns' survival game runs on Unreal Engine. It is CPU-heavy due to AI simulation for the many creatures. Memory leaks can occur in long sessions, making 16GB of RAM a practical minimum.

Palworld - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low303 FPS
medium284 FPS
high228 FPS
ultra211 FPS
1440P
low241 FPS
medium227 FPS
high186 FPS
ultra170 FPS
4K
low159 FPS
medium144 FPS
high120 FPS
ultra93 FPS

Performance Report

Palworld

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 7663
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 211 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 170 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 93 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Palworld. The EPYC 7663 is 266% above the recommended CPU (Core i9-9900K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4090 sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p (low/ultra), all 1440p settings, 4k low, while the EPYC 7663 still has additional frame-generation headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (medium/high), 4k (medium/high/ultra).

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 7663:$6366(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $6366

Combo price: $8015. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 211 FPS, equivalent to 0.03 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.038 fps/$0.035 fps/$0.028 fps/$0.026 fps/$
1440p0.030 fps/$0.028 fps/$0.023 fps/$0.021 fps/$
4k0.020 fps/$0.018 fps/$0.015 fps/$0.012 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 7663|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1440p low, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 209 FPS, while the EPYC 7663 has headroom up to 245 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 15% (FPS gap: 36 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 7/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 5/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the EPYC 7663 frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 7%
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraGPU Limits CPU 7%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 15%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 11%
HighGPU Limits CPU 9%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 10%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 11%
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 7663 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU47% - 67%
<>
GPU71% - 87%
<>
Medium
CPU45% - 64%
<>
GPU71% - 94%
<>
High
CPU47% - 64%
<>
GPU76% - 97%
<>
Ultra
CPU43% - 65%
<>
GPU76% - 97%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU38% - 64%
<>
GPU78% - 87%
<>
Medium
CPU37% - 61%
<>
GPU78% - 94%
<>
High
CPU38% - 61%
<>
GPU85% - 97%
<>
Ultra
CPU34% - 61%
<>
GPU84% - 97%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU31% - 63%
<>
GPU79% - 87%
<>
Medium
CPU30% - 59%
<>
GPU79% - 94%
<>
High
CPU31% - 58%
<>
GPU86% - 97%
<>
Ultra
CPU30% - 59%
<>
GPU85% - 97%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 7663 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 30% and 67% and GPU utilization between 71% and 97%. EPYC 7663 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 83% at 1080p to 88% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 55% to 45%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 92% usage (86-97%), while the EPYC 7663 stays at 44% (31-58%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 55% and GPU 83%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 50% and GPU 87%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 45% and GPU 88%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 56% (47-64%) and GPU 86% (76-97%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 7663 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 7663 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Palworld Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 7663
cpu icon
82,120
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-3570K
RecommendedCore i9-9900K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1050
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070

Your CPU is 266% above and your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+266%vsrecommended

GPU

+136%vsrecommended

CPU

+962%vsminimum

GPU

+657%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1050
Processor: Core i5-3570K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 40 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2070
Processor: Core i9-9900K
Memory: 32 GB
Disk Space: 40 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 7663 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Palworld well?

Yes, the EPYC 7663 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Palworld smoothly up to 4k achieving around 93 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 266% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Palworld?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $8015 ($6366 CPU (Rank #450 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your GeForce RTX 4090 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Palworld performance?

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Palworld performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Palworld?

Palworld does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Palworld?

Palworld requires at minimum a Core i5-3570K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 40 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i9-9900K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 32 GB RAM. Your EPYC 7663 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Palworld FPS estimates for the EPYC 7663 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Palworld FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.