Overwatch 2 refreshed the original with an engine update focused on larger maps and better lighting, while maintaining excellent optimization. The shift to a 5v5 format slightly reduced the visual clutter, helping with frame rate stability. NVIDIA Reflex is essential for reducing latency, supported on GTX 900 series and up. While minimum specs are low, competitive play at 144Hz+ requires a reasonably modern CPU (Intel Skylake / Ryzen Zen 1 or newer) to handle the fast-paced physics and game state updates.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 450 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 325 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 162 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Overwatch 2. The EPYC 8124P is 298% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-4770).
The EPYC 8124P sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p (low/medium), 1440p (low/medium/ultra), all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (high/ultra), 1440p high.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2288. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 450 FPS, equivalent to 0.2 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.259 fps/$ | 0.245 fps/$ | 0.219 fps/$ | 0.197 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.188 fps/$ | 0.174 fps/$ | 0.167 fps/$ | 0.142 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.100 fps/$ | 0.097 fps/$ | 0.093 fps/$ | 0.071 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k low, the EPYC 8124P sets the ceiling at about 228 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 316 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 28% (FPS gap: 88 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 9/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 3/12.
Your EPYC 8124P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 6% | Balanced | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 21% | CPU Limits GPU 16% | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 7% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 28% | CPU Limits GPU 20% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 15% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU40% - 46% <> GPU46% - 68% <> | CPU38% - 46% <> GPU49% - 70% <> | CPU38% - 46% <> GPU49% - 70% <> | CPU33% - 45% <> GPU58% - 78% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU39% - 41% <> GPU49% - 70% <> | CPU37% - 41% <> GPU53% - 74% <> | CPU37% - 41% <> GPU53% - 74% <> | CPU30% - 40% <> GPU68% - 87% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU41% - 55% <> GPU49% - 70% <> | CPU39% - 55% <> GPU53% - 74% <> | CPU39% - 55% <> GPU53% - 74% <> | CPU34% - 54% <> GPU69% - 87% <> |
The EPYC 8124P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 30% and 55% and GPU utilization between 46% and 87%. EPYC 8124P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 61% at 1080p to 67% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 42% to 47%.
The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 78% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 8124P peaks at 48% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 42% and GPU 61%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 38% and GPU 67%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 47% and GPU 67%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 35% (30-40%) and GPU 78% (68-87%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 8124P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 8124P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 298% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+298%vsrecommended
+279%vsrecommended
+2097%vsminimum
+1907%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 8124P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Overwatch 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 162 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 298% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2288 ($639 CPU (Rank #188 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 8124P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8571N is a great upgrade option for around $599 (Rank #60 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.
Your EPYC 8124P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Overwatch 2 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Overwatch 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Overwatch 2 requires at minimum a Core i3-560 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 600 series (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 50 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-4770 and GeForce GTX 1060 with 8 GB RAM. Your EPYC 8124P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Overwatch 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
