TerrariaFPS onEPYC 9135&GeForce RTX 4090

Terraria

A classic 2D sandbox. While generally light, heavy boss fights and fluid physics can slow down older CPUs. It requires Shader Model 2.0 support.

This game has a built-in FPS cap of 60 FPS

Terraria - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1440P
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
4K
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS

Performance Report

Terraria

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 9135
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 130 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 122 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 113 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 6804% above the recommended GPU (GeForce 9600 GT) for Terraria. The EPYC 9135 is 2538% above the recommended CPU (Core 2 Duo).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4090 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the EPYC 9135 still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 9135:$95(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1214

Combo price: $1744. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 130 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.076 fps/$0.076 fps/$0.076 fps/$0.075 fps/$
1440p0.071 fps/$0.070 fps/$0.073 fps/$0.071 fps/$
4k0.066 fps/$0.065 fps/$0.068 fps/$0.065 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 9135|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k low, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 123 FPS, while the EPYC 9135 has headroom up to 191 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 36% (FPS gap: 68 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the EPYC 9135 frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 30%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 28%
HighGPU Limits CPU 28%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 27%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 35%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 34%
HighGPU Limits CPU 35%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 34%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 36%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 35%
HighGPU Limits CPU 35%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 33%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 9135 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU0% - 0%
GPU4% - 14%
<>
Medium
CPU0% - 0%
GPU4% - 14%
<>
High
CPU0% - 0%
GPU4% - 14%
<>
Ultra
CPU5% - 10%
<>
GPU0% - 1%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU0% - 9%
<>
GPU4% - 16%
<>
Medium
CPU0% - 9%
<>
GPU4% - 16%
<>
High
CPU0% - 9%
<>
GPU4% - 16%
<>
Ultra
CPU8% - 15%
<>
GPU2% - 11%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU0% - 3%
<>
GPU11% - 24%
<>
Medium
CPU0% - 3%
<>
GPU11% - 24%
<>
High
CPU0% - 3%
<>
GPU11% - 24%
<>
Ultra
CPU2% - 6%
<>
GPU9% - 18%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 9135 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 0% and 15% and GPU utilization between 0% and 24%. EPYC 9135 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 7% at 1080p to 17% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 2% to 3%.

Load Interpretation

Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 15% and GPU at 24%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 2% and GPU 7%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 6% and GPU 9%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 3% and GPU 17%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 2% (0-3%) and GPU 18% (11-24%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9135 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9135 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Terraria Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 9135
cpu icon
57,808
Your Score
MinimumPentium 4
RecommendedCore 2 Duo
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce FX 5900
RecommendedGeForce 9600 GT

Your CPU is 2538% above and your GPU is 6804% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+2538%vsrecommended

GPU

+6804%vsrecommended

CPU

+1827%vsminimum

GPU

+2422%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce FX 5900
Processor: Pentium 4
Memory: 2.5 GB
Disk Space: 200 MB
System: Windows 7
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce 9600 GT
Processor: Core 2 Duo
Memory: 4 GB
Disk Space: 200 MB
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 9135 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Terraria well?

Yes, the EPYC 9135 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Terraria smoothly up to 4k achieving around 113 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 6804% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 2538% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Terraria?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1744 ($95 CPU (Rank #226 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your GeForce RTX 4090 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Terraria performance?

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Terraria performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Terraria?

Terraria does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Terraria?

Terraria requires at minimum a Pentium 4 (CPU) and GeForce FX 5900 (GPU) with 2.5 GB RAM and 200 MB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core 2 Duo and GeForce 9600 GT with 4 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9135 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Terraria FPS estimates for the EPYC 9135 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Terraria FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.