Returning to compete with Battlefield, Delta Force uses a modern engine featuring environmental destruction. While minimum requirements are accessible (GTX 960), competitive settings scale up to require GTX 10/RTX 20 series GPUs and 16GB of RAM for the best experience.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 258 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 206 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 111 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 315% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) for Delta Force. The EPYC 9175F is 626% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-6500).
At lower resolutions (1080p (low/medium/high)), the EPYC 9175F sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (1440p ultra), the GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p ultra, 1440p (low/medium/high), all 4k settings.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $5352. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 258 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.060 fps/$ | 0.055 fps/$ | 0.054 fps/$ | 0.048 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.047 fps/$ | 0.045 fps/$ | 0.044 fps/$ | 0.038 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.031 fps/$ | 0.029 fps/$ | 0.026 fps/$ | 0.021 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the EPYC 9175F sets the ceiling at about 325 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 371 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 12% (FPS gap: 46 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 3/12 cells, GPU limits 2/12, balanced 7/12.
The EPYC 9175F and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 12% | CPU Limits GPU 11% | CPU Limits GPU 8% | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 7% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 7% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU71% - 88% <> GPU58% - 73% <> | CPU71% - 88% <> GPU58% - 73% <> | CPU70% - 90% <> GPU60% - 75% <> | CPU69% - 90% <> GPU60% - 75% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU33% - 53% <> GPU92% - 95% <> | CPU33% - 53% <> GPU92% - 95% <> | CPU32% - 54% <> GPU93% - 98% <> | CPU31% - 54% <> GPU93% - 98% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU31% - 44% <> GPU93% - 96% <> | CPU31% - 44% <> GPU93% - 96% <> | CPU30% - 45% <> GPU95% - 98% <> | CPU29% - 45% <> GPU95% - 98% <> |
The EPYC 9175F + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 29% and 90% and GPU utilization between 58% and 98%. EPYC 9175F stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 67% at 1080p to 95% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 80% to 38%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 96% usage (93-98%), while the EPYC 9175F stays at 43% (32-54%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 80% and GPU 67%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 43% and GPU 95%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 38% and GPU 95%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 43% (33-53%) and GPU 94% (92-95%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9175F remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9175F and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 626% above and your GPU is 315% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+626%vsrecommended
+315%vsrecommended
+1493%vsminimum
+521%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 9175F paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Delta Force smoothly up to 4k achieving around 111 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 315% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 626% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $5352 ($3703 CPU (Rank #486 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9175F provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 9355P is a great upgrade option for around $2998 (Rank #287 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.
Your EPYC 9175F is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Delta Force performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high. GPU fully utilized at: 1440p ultra.
Delta Force does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Delta Force requires at minimum a Core i3-4150 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 50 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-6500 and GeForce GTX 1060 5GB with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9175F and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Delta Force FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
