PUBG has improved significantly since its early access days but remains a demanding title. Large maps require aggressive asset streaming, making it sensitive to RAM and storage speed. 16GB of RAM is practically mandatory; with only 8GB, you will likely experience stuttering. An SSD is also crucial to ensure textures and buildings load in on time.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 254 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 214 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 111 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS. The EPYC 9255 is 518% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-6600K).
The EPYC 9255 sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p (low/medium/ultra), all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p high.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $3583. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 254 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.112 fps/$ | 0.096 fps/$ | 0.082 fps/$ | 0.071 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.085 fps/$ | 0.077 fps/$ | 0.064 fps/$ | 0.060 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.051 fps/$ | 0.045 fps/$ | 0.039 fps/$ | 0.031 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k medium, the EPYC 9255 sets the ceiling at about 158 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 256 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 38% (FPS gap: 98 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 11/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 1/12.
Your EPYC 9255 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 10% | CPU Limits GPU 9% | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 7% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 18% | CPU Limits GPU 18% | CPU Limits GPU 9% | CPU Limits GPU 13% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 34% | CPU Limits GPU 38% | CPU Limits GPU 28% | CPU Limits GPU 32% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU58% - 84% <> GPU69% - 79% <> | CPU29% - 62% <> GPU68% - 83% <> | CPU29% - 62% <> GPU68% - 83% <> | CPU28% - 71% <> GPU66% - 84% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU58% - 85% <> GPU74% - 83% <> | CPU29% - 64% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU29% - 64% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU27% - 61% <> GPU98% - 100% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU58% - 87% <> GPU73% - 83% <> | CPU29% - 65% <> GPU94% - 100% <> | CPU29% - 65% <> GPU94% - 100% <> | CPU28% - 62% <> GPU97% - 100% <> |
The EPYC 9255 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 27% and 87% and GPU utilization between 66% and 100%. EPYC 9255 stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 75% at 1080p to 93% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 53% to 53%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 99% usage (98-100%), while the EPYC 9255 stays at 44% (27-61%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 53% and GPU 75%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 52% and GPU 93%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 53% and GPU 93%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 72% (58-85%) and GPU 78% (74-83%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9255 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9255 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 518% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+518%vsrecommended
+279%vsrecommended
+1529%vsminimum
+521%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 9255 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS smoothly up to 4k achieving around 111 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 518% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $3583 ($1934 CPU (Rank #300 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9255 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 9455P is a great upgrade option for around $4819 (Rank #344 for value).
Your EPYC 9255 is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS requires at minimum a Core i5-4430 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 40 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-6600K and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9255 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
