Call of Duty: WarzoneFPS onEPYC 9374F&GeForce RTX 4090

Call of Duty: Warzone

A popular competitive game featuring high-intensity action and tactical gameplay.

Call of Duty: Warzone - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low309 FPS
medium284 FPS
high242 FPS
ultra224 FPS
1440P
low289 FPS
medium253 FPS
high209 FPS
ultra198 FPS
4K
low221 FPS
medium188 FPS
high142 FPS
ultra120 FPS

Performance Report

Call of Duty: Warzone

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 9374F
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 224 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 198 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 120 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 535% above the recommended GPU (Unknown GPU) for Call of Duty: Warzone. The EPYC 9374F is 925% above the recommended CPU (Unknown CPU).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The EPYC 9374F sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p (medium/high), 1440p high, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (low/ultra), 1440p (low/medium/ultra), all 4k settings.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 9374F:$3466(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $4850

Combo price: $5115. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 224 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.060 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.047 fps/$0.044 fps/$
1440p0.057 fps/$0.049 fps/$0.041 fps/$0.039 fps/$
4k0.043 fps/$0.037 fps/$0.028 fps/$0.023 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 9374F|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p high, the EPYC 9374F sets the ceiling at about 241 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 263 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 8% (FPS gap: 22 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 4/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 8/12.

Verdict

Well Balanced

The EPYC 9374F and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowBalanced
MediumCPU Limits GPU 7%
HighCPU Limits GPU 8%
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighCPU Limits GPU 7%
UltraBalanced
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighCPU Limits GPU 6%
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 9374F and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU81% - 85%
<>
GPU70% - 89%
<>
Medium
CPU76% - 83%
<>
GPU66% - 96%
<>
High
CPU47% - 76%
<>
GPU67% - 95%
<>
Ultra
CPU53% - 78%
<>
GPU67% - 94%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU78% - 91%
<>
GPU87% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU75% - 91%
<>
GPU96% - 100%
<>
High
CPU53% - 80%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU54% - 83%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU74% - 90%
<>
GPU86% - 92%
<>
Medium
CPU70% - 90%
<>
GPU96% - 100%
<>
High
CPU40% - 64%
<>
GPU96% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU40% - 63%
<>
GPU96% - 99%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 9374F + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 40% and 91% and GPU utilization between 66% and 100%. EPYC 9374F stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 81% at 1080p to 96% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 73% to 67%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 9374F peaks at 84% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 73% and GPU 81%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 75% and GPU 96%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 67% and GPU 96%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 62% (47-76%) and GPU 81% (67-95%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9374F remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9374F and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Call of Duty: Warzone Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 9374F
cpu icon
82,009
Your Score
MinimumUnknown CPU
MinimumUnknown CPU
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumUnknown GPU
MinimumUnknown GPU

Your CPU is 925% above and your GPU is 535% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+925%vsrecommended

GPU

+535%vsrecommended

CPU

+2634%vsminimum

GPU

+3711%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: Unknown GPU
Processor: Unknown CPU
Memory: 8GB
Disk Space: Unknown
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: Unknown GPU
Processor: Unknown CPU
Memory: 16GB
Disk Space: Unknown
System: Windows 10/11

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 9374F and GeForce RTX 4090 run Call of Duty: Warzone well?

Yes, the EPYC 9374F paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Call of Duty: Warzone smoothly up to 4k achieving around 120 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 535% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 925% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Call of Duty: Warzone?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $5115 ($3466 CPU (Rank #392 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9374F provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 9455P is a great upgrade option for around $4819 (Rank #344 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Call of Duty: Warzone performance?

Your EPYC 9374F is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Call of Duty: Warzone performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1440p high.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Call of Duty: Warzone?

Call of Duty: Warzone does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Call of Duty: Warzone?

Call of Duty: Warzone requires at minimum a Unknown CPU (CPU) and Unknown GPU (GPU) with 8GB RAM and Unknown storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Unknown CPU and Unknown GPU with 16GB RAM. Your EPYC 9374F and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Call of Duty: Warzone FPS estimates for the EPYC 9374F and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Call of Duty: Warzone FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.