Returning to compete with Battlefield, Delta Force uses a modern engine featuring environmental destruction. While minimum requirements are accessible (GTX 960), competitive settings scale up to require GTX 10/RTX 20 series GPUs and 16GB of RAM for the best experience.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 205 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 162 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 83 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 315% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) for Delta Force. The EPYC 9374F is 804% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-6500).
The EPYC 9374F sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $5115. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 205 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.058 fps/$ | 0.055 fps/$ | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.040 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.041 fps/$ | 0.041 fps/$ | 0.037 fps/$ | 0.032 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.025 fps/$ | 0.024 fps/$ | 0.021 fps/$ | 0.016 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k low, the EPYC 9374F sets the ceiling at about 128 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 165 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 22% (FPS gap: 37 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your EPYC 9374F is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 12% | CPU Limits GPU 17% | CPU Limits GPU 21% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 17% | CPU Limits GPU 14% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 12% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 22% | CPU Limits GPU 20% | CPU Limits GPU 17% | CPU Limits GPU 18% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU83% - 96% <> GPU56% - 71% <> | CPU83% - 96% <> GPU56% - 71% <> | CPU81% - 97% <> GPU58% - 74% <> | CPU80% - 96% <> GPU59% - 74% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU41% - 63% <> GPU89% - 93% <> | CPU41% - 63% <> GPU89% - 93% <> | CPU39% - 64% <> GPU91% - 96% <> | CPU39% - 64% <> GPU91% - 96% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU39% - 42% <> GPU92% - 94% <> | CPU39% - 42% <> GPU92% - 94% <> | CPU36% - 43% <> GPU94% - 96% <> | CPU36% - 43% <> GPU94% - 96% <> |
The EPYC 9374F + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 36% and 97% and GPU utilization between 56% and 96%. EPYC 9374F reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 65% at 1080p to 94% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 89% to 40%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 95% usage (94-96%), while the EPYC 9374F stays at 40% (36-43%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 89% and GPU 65%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 52% and GPU 93%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 40% and GPU 94%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 52% (41-63%) and GPU 91% (89-93%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9374F remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Both components are stressed near their limits in the heaviest presets (EPYC 9374F: 90% avg, GeForce RTX 4090: 95% avg). A targeted upgrade should follow your target resolution: GPU first for higher image quality, CPU first for higher minimum FPS.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 804% above and your GPU is 315% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+804%vsrecommended
+315%vsrecommended
+1882%vsminimum
+521%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 9374F paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Delta Force smoothly up to 4k achieving around 83 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 315% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 804% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $5115 ($3466 CPU (Rank #392 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9374F provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 9455P is a great upgrade option for around $4819 (Rank #344 for value).
Your EPYC 9374F is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Delta Force performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Delta Force does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Delta Force requires at minimum a Core i3-4150 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 50 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-6500 and GeForce GTX 1060 5GB with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9374F and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Delta Force FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
