The 'COD HQ' ecosystem uses the IW 9.0 engine, which is very demanding on storage and VRAM, often exceeding 100GB in size. 12GB of RAM is the new minimum, and 8GB VRAM cards are starting to struggle at 1440p due to aggressive shader caching and high-fidelity assets.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 244 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 149 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 91 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 124% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 3060) for Call of Duty: Black Ops 6. The EPYC 9455P is 798% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-6700K).
At lower resolutions (all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings), the EPYC 9455P sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (4k (low/medium/high)), the GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 4k ultra.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $6015. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 244 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.066 fps/$ | 0.060 fps/$ | 0.051 fps/$ | 0.041 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.034 fps/$ | 0.032 fps/$ | 0.029 fps/$ | 0.025 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.026 fps/$ | 0.024 fps/$ | 0.020 fps/$ | 0.015 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the EPYC 9455P sets the ceiling at about 395 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 489 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 19% (FPS gap: 94 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 8/12 cells, GPU limits 3/12, balanced 1/12.
Your EPYC 9455P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 19% | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 19% | CPU Limits GPU 17% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 9% | CPU Limits GPU 9% | CPU Limits GPU 9% | CPU Limits GPU 6% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 10% | GPU Limits CPU 12% | GPU Limits CPU 11% | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU41% - 63% <> GPU56% - 76% <> | CPU24% - 39% <> GPU81% - 96% <> | CPU24% - 39% <> GPU81% - 96% <> | CPU24% - 39% <> GPU81% - 96% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU38% - 62% <> GPU58% - 76% <> | CPU22% - 36% <> GPU88% - 97% <> | CPU22% - 36% <> GPU88% - 97% <> | CPU22% - 36% <> GPU88% - 97% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU41% - 57% <> GPU60% - 77% <> | CPU16% - 39% <> GPU94% - 99% <> | CPU16% - 39% <> GPU94% - 99% <> | CPU16% - 39% <> GPU94% - 99% <> |
The EPYC 9455P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 16% and 63% and GPU utilization between 56% and 99%. EPYC 9455P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 83% at 1080p to 89% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 37% to 33%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Medium, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 96% usage (94-99%), while the EPYC 9455P stays at 28% (16-39%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 37% and GPU 83%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 34% and GPU 86%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 33% and GPU 89%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 32% (24-39%) and GPU 88% (81-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9455P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 96% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Medium while the EPYC 9455P still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 798% above and your GPU is 124% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+798%vsrecommended
+124%vsrecommended
+1412%vsminimum
+380%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 9455P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 91 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 124% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 798% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $6015 ($4366 CPU (Rank #344 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9455P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is a great upgrade option for around $11699 (Rank #418 for value).
Your EPYC 9455P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra. GPU fully utilized at: 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 requires at minimum a Core i5-6600 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 102 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-6700K and GeForce RTX 3060 with 12 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9455P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
