DeadlockFPS onEPYC 9534&GeForce RTX 4090

Deadlock

Valve's new MOBA/Shooter hybrid. It has higher requirements than Dota 2, with 16GB of RAM recommended for a smooth experience.

Deadlock - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low292 FPS
medium262 FPS
high222 FPS
ultra203 FPS
1440P
low254 FPS
medium239 FPS
high205 FPS
ultra184 FPS
4K
low141 FPS
medium122 FPS
high109 FPS
ultra91 FPS

Performance Report

Deadlock

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 9534
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 203 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 184 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 91 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Deadlock. The EPYC 9534 is 578% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-6700K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4090 sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p (medium/high), while the EPYC 9534 still has additional frame-generation headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (low/ultra), all 1440p settings, all 4k settings.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 9534:$2999(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $8803

Combo price: $4648. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 203 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.063 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.048 fps/$0.044 fps/$
1440p0.055 fps/$0.051 fps/$0.044 fps/$0.040 fps/$
4k0.030 fps/$0.026 fps/$0.023 fps/$0.020 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 9534|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p high, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 206 FPS, while the EPYC 9534 has headroom up to 223 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 8% (FPS gap: 17 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 2/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 10/12. Confidence is low because both ceilings are very close in this cell.

Verdict

Well Balanced

The EPYC 9534 and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowBalanced
MediumGPU Limits CPU 7%
HighGPU Limits CPU 8%
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 9534 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU78% - 94%
<>
GPU51% - 79%
<>
Medium
CPU75% - 93%
<>
GPU51% - 80%
<>
High
CPU50% - 88%
<>
GPU51% - 80%
<>
Ultra
CPU43% - 81%
<>
GPU50% - 79%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU64% - 82%
<>
GPU53% - 79%
<>
Medium
CPU62% - 81%
<>
GPU53% - 79%
<>
High
CPU38% - 79%
<>
GPU53% - 79%
<>
Ultra
CPU32% - 70%
<>
GPU54% - 79%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU63% - 63%
GPU70% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU61% - 63%
<>
GPU70% - 93%
<>
High
CPU37% - 62%
<>
GPU70% - 93%
<>
Ultra
CPU30% - 50%
<>
GPU71% - 93%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 9534 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 30% and 94% and GPU utilization between 50% and 93%. EPYC 9534 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 65% at 1080p to 82% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 75% to 54%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the EPYC 9534 reaches 86% average load (78-94%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 65% (51-79%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 75% and GPU 65%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 64% and GPU 66%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 54% and GPU 82%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 63% (63-63%) and GPU 82% (70-93%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9534 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9534 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Deadlock Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 9534
cpu icon
89,077
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-2500K
RecommendedCore i7-6700K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 660
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1060

Your CPU is 578% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+578%vsrecommended

GPU

+279%vsrecommended

CPU

+1290%vsminimum

GPU

+843%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 660
Processor: Core i5-2500K
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1060
Processor: Core i7-6700K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 9534 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Deadlock well?

Yes, the EPYC 9534 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Deadlock smoothly up to 4k achieving around 91 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 578% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Deadlock?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $4648 ($2999 CPU (Rank #488 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your GeForce RTX 4090 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Deadlock performance?

Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Deadlock performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p medium, 1080p high.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Deadlock?

Deadlock does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Deadlock?

Deadlock requires at minimum a Core i5-2500K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 20 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-6700K and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9534 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Deadlock FPS estimates for the EPYC 9534 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Deadlock FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.