The lighting engine has been updated over the years. It scales well, but running at 'Ultra' settings with high scaling can challenge even modern GPUs.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 298 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 314 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 243 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 227% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1660) for Euro Truck Simulator 2. The EPYC 9655P is 807% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600).
The EPYC 9655P sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at all 1440p settings, all 4k settings.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $9607. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 298 FPS, equivalent to 0.03 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.045 fps/$ | 0.039 fps/$ | 0.035 fps/$ | 0.031 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.044 fps/$ | 0.038 fps/$ | 0.035 fps/$ | 0.033 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.039 fps/$ | 0.034 fps/$ | 0.032 fps/$ | 0.025 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p ultra, the EPYC 9655P sets the ceiling at about 292 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 344 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 15% (FPS gap: 52 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 5/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 7/12.
The EPYC 9655P and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 10% | CPU Limits GPU 12% | CPU Limits GPU 11% | CPU Limits GPU 15% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 6% | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU20% - 36% <> GPU50% - 71% <> | CPU20% - 36% <> GPU50% - 71% <> | CPU13% - 26% <> GPU71% - 86% <> | CPU13% - 26% <> GPU71% - 86% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU21% - 38% <> GPU36% - 65% <> | CPU21% - 38% <> GPU36% - 65% <> | CPU14% - 28% <> GPU59% - 80% <> | CPU14% - 28% <> GPU59% - 80% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU21% - 38% <> GPU36% - 65% <> | CPU21% - 38% <> GPU36% - 65% <> | CPU14% - 28% <> GPU59% - 80% <> | CPU14% - 28% <> GPU59% - 80% <> |
The EPYC 9655P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 13% and 38% and GPU utilization between 36% and 86%. EPYC 9655P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 69% at 1080p to 60% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 24% to 26%.
The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 78% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 9655P peaks at 30% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 24% and GPU 69%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 26% and GPU 60%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 26% and GPU 60%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 20% (13-26%) and GPU 78% (71-86%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9655P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9655P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 807% above and your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+807%vsrecommended
+227%vsrecommended
+2405%vsminimum
+830%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 9655P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Euro Truck Simulator 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 243 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 227% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 807% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $9607 ($7958 CPU (Rank #420 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9655P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating.
Your EPYC 9655P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Euro Truck Simulator 2 performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-6400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600 and GeForce GTX 1660 with 12 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9655P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
