Riot Games designed Valorant to run on a wide range of hardware by heavily modifying Unreal Engine 4. The game is intentionally CPU-bound to ensure competitive integrity, prioritizing visual clarity over heavy effects. However, Windows 11 users should note the TPM 2.0 and Secure Boot requirements for the Vanguard anti-cheat, which necessitates relatively modern hardware (Intel 8th Gen / Ryzen 2000 or newer) despite the game's low graphical demands. For those aiming for a stable 360 FPS, high CPU clock speeds and low-latency RAM are key.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 450 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 402 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 264 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 500% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) for Valorant. The EPYC 9734 is 1496% above the recommended CPU (Core i3-4150).
The EPYC 9734 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at all 1080p settings.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $8247. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 450 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.082 fps/$ | 0.073 fps/$ | 0.061 fps/$ | 0.055 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.073 fps/$ | 0.065 fps/$ | 0.057 fps/$ | 0.049 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.043 fps/$ | 0.037 fps/$ | 0.032 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k high, the EPYC 9734 sets the ceiling at about 308 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 455 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 32% (FPS gap: 147 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 8/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 4/12.
Your EPYC 9734 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 8% | CPU Limits GPU 11% | CPU Limits GPU 7% | CPU Limits GPU 11% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 24% | CPU Limits GPU 28% | CPU Limits GPU 32% | CPU Limits GPU 31% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU32% - 58% <> GPU25% - 33% <> | CPU32% - 58% <> GPU25% - 33% <> | CPU31% - 57% <> GPU26% - 45% <> | CPU52% - 61% <> GPU29% - 47% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU33% - 59% <> GPU31% - 33% <> | CPU33% - 59% <> GPU31% - 33% <> | CPU34% - 60% <> GPU32% - 46% <> | CPU52% - 61% <> GPU28% - 43% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU30% - 37% <> GPU31% - 31% | CPU30% - 37% <> GPU31% - 31% | CPU31% - 37% <> GPU32% - 43% <> | CPU38% - 49% <> GPU28% - 41% <> |
The EPYC 9734 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 30% and 61% and GPU utilization between 25% and 47%. EPYC 9734 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 33% at 1080p to 34% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 48% to 37%.
The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 39% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 9734 peaks at 56% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 48% and GPU 33%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 49% and GPU 35%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 37% and GPU 34%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 47% (34-60%) and GPU 39% (32-46%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9734 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9734 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 1496% above and your GPU is 500% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+1496%vsrecommended
+500%vsrecommended
+2392%vsminimum
+2484%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC 9734 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Valorant smoothly up to 4k achieving around 264 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 500% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 1496% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $8247 ($6598 CPU (Rank #480 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9734 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is a great upgrade option for around $11699 (Rank #418 for value).
Your EPYC 9734 is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Valorant performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Valorant does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Valorant requires at minimum a Core 2 Duo E8400 (CPU) and GeForce GT 730 (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 23 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i3-4150 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with 8 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9734 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Valorant FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
