League of LegendsFPS onEPYC 9754&GeForce RTX 4090

League of Legends

As the world's most popular MOBA, League of Legends runs on a proprietary engine that has been updated for over a decade. Recently, Riot increased the minimum requirements to include AVX instruction support and dropped support for older OSs and DirectX 9. While still lightweight, modern team fights with complex particle effects can strain older integrated graphics. The game scales well with single-thread CPU performance, meaning even modern entry-level processors can deliver high frame rates.

League of Legends - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low700 FPS
medium600 FPS
high494 FPS
ultra419 FPS
1440P
low580 FPS
medium469 FPS
high372 FPS
ultra316 FPS
4K
low440 FPS
medium341 FPS
high243 FPS
ultra186 FPS

Performance Report

League of Legends

GeForce RTX 4090 + EPYC 9754
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 419 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 316 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 186 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 1277% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 560) for League of Legends. The EPYC 9754 is 1437% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-3330).

⚙️Bottleneck Analysis

The EPYC 9754 determines the performance ceiling at all 1440p settings, 4k (medium/high/ultra), while the GPU has headroom. The system is well balanced at all 1080p settings, 4k low.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
EPYC 9754:$10631(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $11900

Combo price: $12280. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 419 FPS, equivalent to 0.03 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.057 fps/$0.049 fps/$0.040 fps/$0.034 fps/$
1440p0.047 fps/$0.038 fps/$0.030 fps/$0.026 fps/$
4k0.036 fps/$0.028 fps/$0.020 fps/$0.015 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

EPYC 9754|GeForce RTX 4090
📈Analysis

At 4k high, the EPYC 9754 sets the ceiling at about 243 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 306 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 21% (FPS gap: 63 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 7/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 5/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your EPYC 9754 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 11%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 10%
HighCPU Limits GPU 14%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 8%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumCPU Limits GPU 11%
HighCPU Limits GPU 21%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 20%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for EPYC 9754 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU38% - 80%
<>
GPU25% - 29%
<>
Medium
CPU50% - 84%
<>
GPU28% - 31%
<>
High
CPU50% - 84%
<>
GPU28% - 31%
<>
Ultra
CPU46% - 83%
<>
GPU31% - 31%

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU39% - 81%
<>
GPU31% - 38%
<>
Medium
CPU51% - 84%
<>
GPU34% - 39%
<>
High
CPU51% - 84%
<>
GPU34% - 39%
<>
Ultra
CPU46% - 83%
<>
GPU37% - 40%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU37% - 80%
<>
GPU53% - 56%
<>
Medium
CPU47% - 84%
<>
GPU54% - 60%
<>
High
CPU47% - 84%
<>
GPU54% - 60%
<>
Ultra
CPU43% - 83%
<>
GPU54% - 63%
<>

Performance Summary

The EPYC 9754 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 37% and 84% and GPU utilization between 25% and 63%. EPYC 9754 stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 30% at 1080p to 57% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 64% to 63%.

Bottleneck Analysis

The utilization pattern is relatively balanced. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 58% average at its highest-load preset, while the EPYC 9754 peaks at 68% average, with no single component consistently acting as a hard bottleneck.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 64% and GPU 30%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 65% and GPU 36%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 63% and GPU 57%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 63% (43-83%) and GPU 58% (54-63%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC 9754 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC 9754 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.

  • The Ideal Scenario (GPU Bottleneck): You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage. This indicates your system is successfully pushing out graphics as fast as it can, without being held back by the CPU.
  • CPU Bottleneck: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the CPU is struggling to compute game logic and prepare frames fast enough. The GPU sits waiting, often resulting in stuttering, inconsistent frame times, and lower overall FPS.
  • Engine Limits or Capped FPS: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

League of Legends Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - EPYC 9754
cpu icon
98,450
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-530
RecommendedCore i5-3330
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce 9600 GT
RecommendedGeForce GTX 560

Your CPU is 1437% above and your GPU is 1277% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+1437%vsrecommended

GPU

+1277%vsrecommended

CPU

+4593%vsminimum

GPU

+6755%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce 9600 GT
Processor: Core i3-530
Memory: 2 GB
Disk Space: 16 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 560
Processor: Core i5-3330
Memory: 4 GB
Disk Space: 16 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 11 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the EPYC 9754 and GeForce RTX 4090 run League of Legends well?

Yes, the EPYC 9754 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run League of Legends smoothly up to 4k achieving around 186 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 1277% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 1437% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run League of Legends?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $12280 ($10631 CPU (Rank #509 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC 9754 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is a great upgrade option for around $7999 (Rank #378 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve League of Legends performance?

Your EPYC 9754 is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your League of Legends performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for League of Legends?

League of Legends does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for League of Legends?

League of Legends requires at minimum a Core i3-530 (CPU) and GeForce 9600 GT (GPU) with 2 GB RAM and 16 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-3330 and GeForce GTX 560 with 4 GB RAM. Your EPYC 9754 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these League of Legends FPS estimates for the EPYC 9754 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These League of Legends FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.