Rocket League is known for its technical stability. Running on Unreal Engine 3, it is extremely lightweight with physics calculated at a fixed rate for consistency. It is so well optimized that modern integrated graphics can run it competitively at low settings without issue.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 450 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 438 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 254 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 700% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 660) for Rocket League. The EPYC Embedded 8224P is 2146% above the recommended CPU (Quad Core 2.5 GHz).
The EPYC Embedded 8224P sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p medium, 1440p (low/medium/high), all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (low/high/ultra), 1440p ultra.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2697. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 450 FPS, equivalent to 0.17 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.245 fps/$ | 0.200 fps/$ | 0.179 fps/$ | 0.167 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.233 fps/$ | 0.193 fps/$ | 0.169 fps/$ | 0.162 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.159 fps/$ | 0.123 fps/$ | 0.108 fps/$ | 0.094 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k medium, the EPYC Embedded 8224P sets the ceiling at about 333 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 481 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 31% (FPS gap: 148 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 9/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 3/12.
Your EPYC Embedded 8224P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 6% | CPU Limits GPU 10% | Balanced | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 10% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 9% | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 20% | CPU Limits GPU 31% | CPU Limits GPU 30% | CPU Limits GPU 30% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU29% - 40% <> GPU6% - 23% <> | CPU29% - 40% <> GPU6% - 23% <> | CPU29% - 40% <> GPU6% - 23% <> | CPU25% - 35% <> GPU10% - 25% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU21% - 33% <> GPU0% - 19% <> | CPU21% - 33% <> GPU0% - 19% <> | CPU21% - 33% <> GPU0% - 19% <> | CPU16% - 28% <> GPU2% - 22% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU21% - 31% <> GPU20% - 46% <> | CPU21% - 31% <> GPU20% - 46% <> | CPU21% - 31% <> GPU20% - 46% <> | CPU16% - 26% <> GPU25% - 48% <> |
The EPYC Embedded 8224P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 16% and 40% and GPU utilization between 0% and 48%. EPYC Embedded 8224P keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 15% at 1080p to 34% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 33% to 25%.
Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 40% and GPU at 48%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 33% and GPU 15%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 26% and GPU 11%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 25% and GPU 34%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 21% (16-26%) and GPU 36% (25-48%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while EPYC Embedded 8224P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the EPYC Embedded 8224P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 2146% above and your GPU is 700% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+2146%vsrecommended
+700%vsrecommended
+2130%vsminimum
+3076%vsminimum
Yes, the EPYC Embedded 8224P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Rocket League smoothly up to 4k achieving around 254 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 700% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 2146% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2697 ($1048 CPU (Rank #182 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your EPYC Embedded 8224P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 4585PX is a great upgrade option for around $699 (Rank #66 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.
Your EPYC Embedded 8224P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Rocket League performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p medium, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Rocket League does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Rocket League requires at minimum a Dual Core 2.4 GHz (CPU) and GeForce GTX 260 (GPU) with 2 GB RAM and 20 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Quad Core 2.5 GHz and GeForce GTX 660 with 4 GB RAM. Your EPYC Embedded 8224P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Rocket League FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
