Baldur's Gate 3FPS onFX-8150&GeForce RTX 4090

Baldur's Gate 3

A dense RPG where Act 3 becomes a CPU stress test due to the high number of NPCs. An SSD is vital for loading times. 16GB of RAM is recommended, and the game benefits greatly from upscaling tech like DLSS and FSR.

Baldur's Gate 3 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low133 FPS
medium133 FPS
high133 FPS
ultra117 FPS
1440P
low133 FPS
medium133 FPS
high116 FPS
ultra94 FPS
4K
low117 FPS
medium105 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra66 FPS

Performance Report

Baldur's Gate 3

GeForce RTX 4090 + FX-8150
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 117 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 94 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 66 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 131% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060 Super) for Baldur's Gate 3. The FX-8150 is 10% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

At lower resolutions (all 1080p settings, 1440p (low/ultra)), the FX-8150 sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (4k (low/medium/high)), the GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1440p (medium/high), 4k ultra.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
FX-8150:$50(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $245

Combo price: $1699. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 117 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.078 fps/$0.078 fps/$0.078 fps/$0.069 fps/$
1440p0.078 fps/$0.078 fps/$0.068 fps/$0.055 fps/$
4k0.069 fps/$0.062 fps/$0.050 fps/$0.039 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

FX-8150|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the FX-8150 sets the ceiling at about 133 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 275 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 52% (FPS gap: 142 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 6/12 cells, GPU limits 3/12, balanced 3/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your FX-8150 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 52%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 45%
HighCPU Limits GPU 34%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 32%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 17%
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraCPU Limits GPU 12%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 10%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 13%
HighGPU Limits CPU 11%
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for FX-8150 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU93% - 100%
<>
GPU24% - 86%
<>
Medium
CPU90% - 100%
<>
GPU32% - 85%
<>
High
CPU90% - 100%
<>
GPU40% - 89%
<>
Ultra
CPU93% - 100%
<>
GPU47% - 92%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU91% - 100%
<>
GPU28% - 89%
<>
Medium
CPU88% - 100%
<>
GPU35% - 87%
<>
High
CPU88% - 100%
<>
GPU43% - 92%
<>
Ultra
CPU92% - 99%
<>
GPU50% - 92%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU93% - 100%
<>
GPU67% - 90%
<>
Medium
CPU90% - 100%
<>
GPU72% - 89%
<>
High
CPU90% - 100%
<>
GPU76% - 96%
<>
Ultra
CPU93% - 100%
<>
GPU77% - 95%
<>

Performance Summary

The FX-8150 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 88% and 100% and GPU utilization between 24% and 96%. FX-8150 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 62% at 1080p to 83% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 96% to 96%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the FX-8150 reaches 96% average load (93-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 55% (24-86%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 96% and GPU 62%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 95% and GPU 65%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 96% and GPU 83%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 95% (90-100%) and GPU 86% (76-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while FX-8150 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the FX-8150 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Baldur's Gate 3 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - FX-8150
cpu icon
5,318
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4690
RecommendedCore i7-8700K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 970
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060 Super

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (10% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-70%vsrecommended

GPU

+131%vsrecommended

CPU

-10%vsminimum

GPU

+295%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-4690
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Processor: Core i7-8700K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the FX-8150 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Baldur's Gate 3 well?

Yes, the FX-8150 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Baldur's Gate 3 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 66 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 70% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Baldur's Gate 3?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1699 ($50 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Baldur's Gate 3 performance?

For Baldur's Gate 3, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The FX-8150 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p ultra. GPU fully utilized at: 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Baldur's Gate 3?

Baldur's Gate 3 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Baldur's Gate 3?

Baldur's Gate 3 requires at minimum a Core i5-4690 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 150 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-8700K and GeForce RTX 2060 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Baldur's Gate 3 FPS estimates for the FX-8150 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Baldur's Gate 3 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.