Naraka: BladepointFPS onFX-9370&GeForce RTX 4090

Naraka: Bladepoint

Unlike shooters, Naraka focuses on melee combat with fluid animations. The game is visually dense and supports DLSS, which is vital for high frame rates at resolutions above 1080p. An SSD is critical for map loading, and 16GB of RAM is recommended for smooth gameplay.

Naraka: Bladepoint - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low159 FPS
medium159 FPS
high159 FPS
ultra146 FPS
1440P
low159 FPS
medium155 FPS
high126 FPS
ultra103 FPS
4K
low138 FPS
medium116 FPS
high96 FPS
ultra82 FPS

Performance Report

Naraka: Bladepoint

GeForce RTX 4090 + FX-9370
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 146 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 103 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 82 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Naraka: Bladepoint. The FX-9370 is 52% below recommended, but 30% above minimum.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The FX-9370 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
FX-9370:$60(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $42

Combo price: $1709. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 146 FPS, equivalent to 0.09 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.093 fps/$0.093 fps/$0.093 fps/$0.085 fps/$
1440p0.093 fps/$0.091 fps/$0.074 fps/$0.060 fps/$
4k0.081 fps/$0.068 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.048 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

FX-9370|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the FX-9370 sets the ceiling at about 159 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 486 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 67% (FPS gap: 327 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your FX-9370 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 67%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 62%
HighCPU Limits GPU 56%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 50%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 50%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 46%
HighCPU Limits GPU 50%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 48%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 24%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 24%
HighCPU Limits GPU 29%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 31%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for FX-9370 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU50% - 76%
<>
GPU76% - 96%
<>
Medium
CPU50% - 76%
<>
GPU76% - 96%
<>
High
CPU19% - 48%
<>
GPU95% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU35% - 60%
<>
GPU89% - 100%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU48% - 73%
<>
GPU83% - 96%
<>
Medium
CPU48% - 73%
<>
GPU83% - 96%
<>
High
CPU14% - 44%
<>
GPU100% - 100%
Ultra
CPU31% - 56%
<>
GPU99% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU47% - 64%
<>
GPU75% - 96%
<>
Medium
CPU47% - 64%
<>
GPU75% - 96%
<>
High
CPU12% - 35%
<>
GPU95% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU22% - 42%
<>
GPU89% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The FX-9370 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 12% and 76% and GPU utilization between 75% and 100%. FX-9370 stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 91% at 1080p to 91% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 52% to 42%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the FX-9370 stays at 29% (14-44%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 52% and GPU 91%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 48% and GPU 95%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 42% and GPU 91%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 63% (50-76%) and GPU 86% (76-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while FX-9370 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 100% average load at 1440p (2K QHD) High while the FX-9370 still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Naraka: Bladepoint Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - FX-9370
cpu icon
6,374
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4460
RecommendedCore i7-7700
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 750 Ti
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1060

Your CPU is 52% below recommended and your GPU is 279% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

-52%vsrecommended

GPU

+279%vsrecommended

CPU

+30%vsminimum

GPU

+877%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Processor: Core i5-4460
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1060
Processor: Core i7-7700
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the FX-9370 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Naraka: Bladepoint well?

Yes, the FX-9370 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Naraka: Bladepoint smoothly up to 4k achieving around 82 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 52% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Naraka: Bladepoint?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1709 ($60 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Naraka: Bladepoint performance?

For Naraka: Bladepoint, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The FX-9370 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Naraka: Bladepoint?

Naraka: Bladepoint does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Naraka: Bladepoint?

Naraka: Bladepoint requires at minimum a Core i5-4460 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 20 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-7700 and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Naraka: Bladepoint FPS estimates for the FX-9370 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Naraka: Bladepoint FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.