Extremely accessible and runs on almost anything. It is single-threaded with negligible GPU load. However, installing many mods can increase RAM usage to 2-4GB.
This game has a built-in FPS cap of 60 FPS
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 81 FPS. At 1440p, frame rates range from 36 to 44 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 32 to 39 FPS.
The Arc A310 is 139% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 460) for Stardew Valley. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 160% above the recommended CPU (Core i3).
The Arc A310 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $484. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 81 FPS, equivalent to 0.17 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.217 fps/$ | 0.217 fps/$ | 0.221 fps/$ | 0.167 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.089 fps/$ | 0.091 fps/$ | 0.091 fps/$ | 0.074 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.079 fps/$ | 0.081 fps/$ | 0.079 fps/$ | 0.066 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the Arc A310 sets the ceiling at about 57 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 437 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 87% (FPS gap: 380 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Arc A310 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | GPU Limits CPU 87% | GPU Limits CPU 87% | GPU Limits CPU 87% | GPU Limits CPU 78% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 57% | GPU Limits CPU 59% | GPU Limits CPU 58% | GPU Limits CPU 33% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 55% | GPU Limits CPU 56% | GPU Limits CPU 56% | GPU Limits CPU 35% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU7% - 7% GPU6% - 15% <> | CPU7% - 7% GPU6% - 15% <> | CPU7% - 7% GPU6% - 15% <> | CPU2% - 8% <> GPU6% - 15% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU6% - 7% <> GPU9% - 24% <> | CPU6% - 7% <> GPU9% - 24% <> | CPU6% - 7% <> GPU9% - 24% <> | CPU2% - 10% <> GPU9% - 23% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU6% - 7% <> GPU14% - 31% <> | CPU6% - 7% <> GPU14% - 31% <> | CPU6% - 7% <> GPU14% - 31% <> | CPU2% - 10% <> GPU14% - 31% <> |
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Arc A310 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 2% and 10% and GPU utilization between 6% and 31%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Arc A310 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 10% at 1080p to 22% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 7% to 6%.
Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 10% and GPU at 31%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 7% and GPU 10%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 6% and GPU 16%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 6% and GPU 22%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.
4K (Ultra HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 6% (6-7%) and GPU 22% (14-31%), which keeps Arc A310 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A310 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 160% above and your GPU is 139% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+160%vsrecommended
+139%vsrecommended
+1465%vsminimum
+3625%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Arc A310 can run Stardew Valley smoothly up to 1080p achieving around 81 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 139% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 160% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $484 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $100 GPU (Rank #62 Value)). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the GeForce RTX 5060 for around $299 (Rank #2 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.
For Stardew Valley, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Arc A310 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Stardew Valley does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Stardew Valley requires at minimum a Core 2 Duo (CPU) and GeForce 7 series (GPU) with 2 GB RAM and 500 MB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i3 and GeForce GTX 460 with 4 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A310 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Stardew Valley FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
