Monster Hunter WildsFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Arc A380

Monster Hunter Wilds

A heavy RE Engine title using advanced geometry and global illumination. It has sparked discussion by listing Frame Generation as a requirement for 60 FPS in its recommended specs. An SSD is mandatory.

Monster Hunter Wilds - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low96 FPS
medium74 FPS
high66 FPS
ultra46 FPS
1440P
low66 FPS
medium53 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra35 FPS
4K
low39 FPS
medium32 FPS
high29 FPS
ultra24 FPS

Performance Report

Monster Hunter Wilds

Arc A380 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 46 to 96 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 35 to 66 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 24 to 39 FPS.

⚠️Official Requirements

The Arc A380 is 53% below minimum GPU requirement for Monster Hunter Wilds. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 76% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-11600K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Arc A380 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

Arc A380:$119(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $149
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $503. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 46 FPS, equivalent to 0.09 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.191 fps/$0.147 fps/$0.131 fps/$0.091 fps/$
1440p0.131 fps/$0.105 fps/$0.099 fps/$0.070 fps/$
4k0.078 fps/$0.064 fps/$0.058 fps/$0.048 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Arc A380

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1440p ultra, the Arc A380 sets the ceiling at about 32 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 99 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 68% (FPS gap: 67 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your Arc A380 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 48%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 54%
HighGPU Limits CPU 47%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 63%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 54%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 58%
HighGPU Limits CPU 57%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 68%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 61%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 62%
HighGPU Limits CPU 63%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 67%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A380

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU43% - 54%
<>
GPU91% - 95%
<>
Medium
CPU47% - 59%
<>
GPU87% - 95%
<>
High
CPU35% - 55%
<>
GPU93% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU37% - 54%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU32% - 50%
<>
GPU96% - 97%
<>
Medium
CPU35% - 54%
<>
GPU96% - 99%
<>
High
CPU25% - 50%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU28% - 48%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU29% - 42%
<>
GPU95% - 98%
<>
Medium
CPU31% - 47%
<>
GPU95% - 99%
<>
High
CPU21% - 42%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU24% - 42%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Arc A380 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 21% and 59% and GPU utilization between 87% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Arc A380 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 94% at 1080p to 98% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 48% to 35%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) High, the Arc A380 averages 99% usage (98-100%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 38% (25-50%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 48% and GPU 94%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 40% and GPU 98%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 35% and GPU 98%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 53% (47-59%) and GPU 91% (87-95%), which keeps Arc A380 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The Arc A380 reaches 99% average load at 1440p (2K QHD) High while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Monster Hunter Wilds Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-10600
RecommendedCore i5-11600K
GPU - Arc A380
gpu icon
6,301
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1660 Super
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070 Super

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. GPU is the limiting factor (53% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

+76%vsrecommended

GPU

-68%vsrecommended

CPU

+94%vsminimum

GPU

-53%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i5-10600
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 140 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Processor: Core i5-11600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 140 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A380 run Monster Hunter Wilds well?

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A380 will struggle to run Monster Hunter Wilds at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 46 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Monster Hunter Wilds?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $503 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $119 GPU (Rank #58 Value)). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the GeForce RTX 5060 for around $299 (Rank #2 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Monster Hunter Wilds performance?

For Monster Hunter Wilds, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Arc A380 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Monster Hunter Wilds?

Monster Hunter Wilds does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Monster Hunter Wilds?

Monster Hunter Wilds requires at minimum a Core i5-10600 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1660 Super (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 140 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Monster Hunter Wilds FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A380?

These Monster Hunter Wilds FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.