Throne and LibertyFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Arc A580

Throne and Liberty

Built for massive sieges, this MMO creates a significant CPU bottleneck in large battles. 16GB of RAM is the minimum, setting a standard for next-gen MMOs.

Throne and Liberty - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low96 FPS
medium89 FPS
high81 FPS
ultra73 FPS
1440P
low89 FPS
medium84 FPS
high77 FPS
ultra65 FPS
4K
low67 FPS
medium60 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra42 FPS

Performance Report

Throne and Liberty

Arc A580 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 73 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 65 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 42 to 67 FPS.

Official Requirements

The Arc A580 is 10% below recommended, but 97% above minimum for Throne and Liberty. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 76% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-11600K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Arc A580 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

Arc A580:$179(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $179
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $563. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 73 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.171 fps/$0.158 fps/$0.144 fps/$0.130 fps/$
1440p0.158 fps/$0.149 fps/$0.137 fps/$0.115 fps/$
4k0.119 fps/$0.107 fps/$0.085 fps/$0.075 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Arc A580

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the Arc A580 sets the ceiling at about 98 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 265 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 63% (FPS gap: 167 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your Arc A580 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 63%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 62%
HighGPU Limits CPU 61%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 61%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 61%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 62%
HighGPU Limits CPU 61%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 59%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 61%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 63%
HighGPU Limits CPU 63%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 59%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A580

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU58% - 64%
<>
GPU65% - 92%
<>
Medium
CPU45% - 68%
<>
GPU64% - 85%
<>
High
CPU45% - 68%
<>
GPU64% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU33% - 53%
<>
GPU63% - 85%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU55% - 59%
<>
GPU65% - 92%
<>
Medium
CPU38% - 61%
<>
GPU65% - 85%
<>
High
CPU38% - 61%
<>
GPU65% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU26% - 46%
<>
GPU65% - 85%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU55% - 75%
<>
GPU60% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU46% - 77%
<>
GPU60% - 90%
<>
High
CPU46% - 77%
<>
GPU60% - 90%
<>
Ultra
CPU35% - 62%
<>
GPU60% - 90%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Arc A580 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 26% and 77% and GPU utilization between 60% and 93%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays in a controlled operating range, while Arc A580 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 75% at 1080p to 75% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 54% to 59%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The Arc A580 reaches 78% average at its highest-load preset, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D peaks at 65% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 54% and GPU 75%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 48% and GPU 76%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 59% and GPU 75%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 61% (58-64%) and GPU 78% (65-92%), which keeps Arc A580 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A580 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Throne and Liberty Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-7700
RecommendedCore i5-11600K
GPU - Arc A580
gpu icon
12,060
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 960
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1660

Your CPU is 76% below recommended and your GPU is 10% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

+76%vsrecommended

GPU

-10%vsrecommended

CPU

+161%vsminimum

GPU

+97%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 960
Processor: Core i5-7700
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 63 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1660
Processor: Core i5-11600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 63 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A580 run Throne and Liberty well?

Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Arc A580 can run Throne and Liberty smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 65 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 10% below the recommended specs, and your CPU is 76% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Throne and Liberty?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $563 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $179 GPU (Rank #7 Value)). Your build is already very cost-efficient, but if you want even more FPS, the next good option is upgrading the GPU. For example, upgrading to the GeForce RTX 5060 for around $299 (Rank #2 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Throne and Liberty performance?

For Throne and Liberty, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Arc A580 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Throne and Liberty?

Throne and Liberty does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Throne and Liberty?

Throne and Liberty requires at minimum a Core i5-7700 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 63 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-11600K and GeForce GTX 1660 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Throne and Liberty FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Arc A580?

These Throne and Liberty FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.