Bethesda's Creation Engine 2 is CPU-dependent, especially in cities, and requires an SSD for asset streaming. Optimization tends to favor AMD slightly, but generally requires powerful hardware to run smoothly.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 83 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 74 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 55 to 88 FPS.
The Arc A770 is 9% below minimum GPU requirement for Starfield. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 89% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10600K).
The Arc A770 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $664. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 83 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.196 fps/$ | 0.148 fps/$ | 0.131 fps/$ | 0.125 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.164 fps/$ | 0.133 fps/$ | 0.122 fps/$ | 0.111 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.133 fps/$ | 0.108 fps/$ | 0.093 fps/$ | 0.083 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1440p medium, the Arc A770 sets the ceiling at about 77 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 201 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 62% (FPS gap: 124 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Arc A770 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | GPU Limits CPU 41% | GPU Limits CPU 53% | GPU Limits CPU 52% | GPU Limits CPU 50% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 52% | GPU Limits CPU 62% | GPU Limits CPU 61% | GPU Limits CPU 61% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 33% | GPU Limits CPU 43% | GPU Limits CPU 46% | GPU Limits CPU 46% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU44% - 51% <> GPU61% - 92% <> | CPU42% - 46% <> GPU86% - 96% <> | CPU37% - 43% <> GPU93% - 99% <> | CPU34% - 41% <> GPU95% - 100% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU32% - 39% <> GPU90% - 94% <> | CPU30% - 39% <> GPU91% - 97% <> | CPU28% - 36% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU27% - 31% <> GPU98% - 100% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU25% - 30% <> GPU94% - 94% | CPU22% - 30% <> GPU97% - 97% | CPU19% - 29% <> GPU99% - 100% <> | CPU17% - 26% <> GPU100% - 100% |
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Arc A770 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 17% and 51% and GPU utilization between 61% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Arc A770 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 90% at 1080p to 98% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 43% to 25%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the Arc A770 averages 100% usage (99-100%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 24% (19-29%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 43% and GPU 90%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 33% and GPU 96%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 25% and GPU 98%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 44% (42-46%) and GPU 91% (86-96%), which keeps Arc A770 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The Arc A770 reaches 100% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) High while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your hardware is below minimum requirements. GPU is the limiting factor (9% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.
+89%vsrecommended
-47%vsrecommended
+147%vsminimum
-9%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Arc A770 can run Starfield smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 74 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 47% below the recommended specs, and your CPU is 89% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $664 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $280 GPU (Rank #56 Value)). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the GeForce RTX 5060 for around $299 (Rank #2 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.
For Starfield, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Arc A770 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Starfield does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Starfield requires at minimum a Core i7-6800K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600K and GeForce RTX 2080 with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.
These Starfield FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
