Call of Duty: WarzoneFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Call of Duty: Warzone

A popular competitive game featuring high-intensity action and tactical gameplay.

Call of Duty: Warzone - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low117 FPS
medium93 FPS
high78 FPS
ultra63 FPS
1440P
low116 FPS
medium98 FPS
high73 FPS
ultra62 FPS
4K
low45 FPS
medium41 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra28 FPS

Performance Report

Call of Duty: Warzone

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 63 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 62 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 28 to 45 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is 112% above the recommended GPU (Unknown GPU) for Call of Duty: Warzone. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 329% above the recommended CPU (Unknown CPU).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER:$110(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $229
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $494. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 63 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.237 fps/$0.188 fps/$0.158 fps/$0.128 fps/$
1440p0.235 fps/$0.198 fps/$0.148 fps/$0.126 fps/$
4k0.091 fps/$0.083 fps/$0.067 fps/$0.057 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k low, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER sets the ceiling at about 49 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 214 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 77% (FPS gap: 165 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 57%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 63%
HighGPU Limits CPU 64%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 71%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 56%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 58%
HighGPU Limits CPU 64%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 69%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 77%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 76%
HighGPU Limits CPU 74%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 76%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU53% - 88%
<>
GPU70% - 89%
<>
Medium
CPU58% - 88%
<>
GPU73% - 92%
<>
High
CPU36% - 71%
<>
GPU77% - 93%
<>
Ultra
CPU40% - 71%
<>
GPU77% - 92%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU49% - 76%
<>
GPU91% - 94%
<>
Medium
CPU56% - 76%
<>
GPU96% - 96%
High
CPU37% - 56%
<>
GPU97% - 97%
Ultra
CPU27% - 59%
<>
GPU94% - 96%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU49% - 77%
<>
GPU91% - 94%
<>
Medium
CPU55% - 77%
<>
GPU96% - 99%
<>
High
CPU36% - 55%
<>
GPU97% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU26% - 54%
<>
GPU96% - 98%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 26% and 88% and GPU utilization between 70% and 99%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 83% at 1080p to 96% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 63% to 54%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER reaches 98% average at its highest-load preset, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D peaks at 73% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 63% and GPU 83%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 54% and GPU 95%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 54% and GPU 96%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 54% (36-71%) and GPU 85% (77-93%), which keeps GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Call of Duty: Warzone Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumUnknown CPU
MinimumUnknown CPU
GPU - GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
gpu icon
12,692
Your Score
MinimumUnknown GPU
MinimumUnknown GPU

Your CPU is 329% above and your GPU is 112% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+329%vsrecommended

GPU

+112%vsrecommended

CPU

+1043%vsminimum

GPU

+1169%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: Unknown GPU
Processor: Unknown CPU
Memory: 8GB
Disk Space: Unknown
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: Unknown GPU
Processor: Unknown CPU
Memory: 16GB
Disk Space: Unknown
System: Windows 10/11

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER run Call of Duty: Warzone well?

Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER can run Call of Duty: Warzone smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 62 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 112% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 329% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Call of Duty: Warzone?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $494 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $110 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the GeForce RTX 5060 for around $299 (Rank #2 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Call of Duty: Warzone performance?

For Call of Duty: Warzone, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Call of Duty: Warzone?

Call of Duty: Warzone does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Call of Duty: Warzone?

Call of Duty: Warzone requires at minimum a Unknown CPU (CPU) and Unknown GPU (GPU) with 8GB RAM and Unknown storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Unknown CPU and Unknown GPU with 16GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Call of Duty: Warzone FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?

These Call of Duty: Warzone FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.