Destiny 2FPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&GeForce MX250

Destiny 2

Uses the stable Tiger engine. It has dropped support for older OSs and requires significant storage space. A decent CPU is needed for raids and activities with many enemies.

Destiny 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low82 FPS
medium62 FPS
high54 FPS
ultra37 FPS
1440P
low57 FPS
medium38 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra19 FPS
4K
low20 FPS
medium15 FPS
high12 FPS
ultra11 FPS

Performance Report

Destiny 2

GeForce MX250 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 37 to 82 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 19 to 57 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 11 to 20 FPS.

⚠️Official Requirements

The GeForce MX250 is 41% below minimum GPU requirement for Destiny 2. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 164% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-2400).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The GeForce MX250 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce MX250:$150(updated 2/9/2026)
Official Launch Price: $150
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $534. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 37 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.154 fps/$0.116 fps/$0.101 fps/$0.069 fps/$
1440p0.107 fps/$0.071 fps/$0.052 fps/$0.036 fps/$
4k0.037 fps/$0.028 fps/$0.022 fps/$0.021 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|GeForce MX250

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k medium, the GeForce MX250 sets the ceiling at about 16 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 201 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 92% (FPS gap: 185 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your GeForce MX250 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 74%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 78%
HighGPU Limits CPU 77%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 84%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 81%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 86%
HighGPU Limits CPU 89%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 91%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 90%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 92%
HighGPU Limits CPU 92%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 92%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce MX250

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU35% - 42%
<>
GPU82% - 92%
<>
Medium
CPU35% - 42%
<>
GPU82% - 92%
<>
High
CPU40% - 58%
<>
GPU82% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU39% - 50%
<>
GPU89% - 99%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU37% - 40%
<>
GPU85% - 91%
<>
Medium
CPU37% - 40%
<>
GPU85% - 91%
<>
High
CPU36% - 50%
<>
GPU90% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU35% - 42%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU36% - 37%
<>
GPU85% - 91%
<>
Medium
CPU36% - 37%
<>
GPU85% - 91%
<>
High
CPU32% - 47%
<>
GPU91% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU30% - 39%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + GeForce MX250 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 30% and 58% and GPU utilization between 82% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce MX250 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 90% at 1080p to 93% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 42% to 37%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the GeForce MX250 averages 99% usage (98-100%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 34% (30-39%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 42% and GPU 90%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 39% and GPU 92%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 37% and GPU 93%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 38% (37-40%) and GPU 88% (85-91%), which keeps GeForce MX250 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce MX250 reaches 99% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Destiny 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-3250
RecommendedCore i5-2400
GPU - GeForce MX250
gpu icon
2,375
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 660
RecommendedGeForce GTX 970

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. GPU is the limiting factor (41% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

+164%vsrecommended

GPU

-75%vsrecommended

CPU

+977%vsminimum

GPU

-41%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 660
Processor: Core i3-3250
Memory: 6 GB
Disk Space: 105 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-2400
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 105 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce MX250 run Destiny 2 well?

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce MX250 will struggle to run Destiny 2 at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 37 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Destiny 2?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $534 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $150 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel) (Rank #2 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Destiny 2 performance?

For Destiny 2, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The GeForce MX250 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Destiny 2?

Destiny 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Destiny 2?

Destiny 2 requires at minimum a Core i3-3250 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 105 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-2400 and GeForce GTX 970 with 8 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Destiny 2 FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and GeForce MX250?

These Destiny 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.