Path of Exile 2FPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Intel Arc Pro A60

Path of Exile 2

A massive evolution with physically based rendering and fluid animations. The high density of effects creates a heavy load on both CPU and GPU. It scales well up to 16 threads.

Path of Exile 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low162 FPS
medium119 FPS
high103 FPS
ultra81 FPS
1440P
low104 FPS
medium70 FPS
high61 FPS
ultra44 FPS
4K
low43 FPS
medium32 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra18 FPS

Performance Report

Path of Exile 2

Intel Arc Pro A60 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 81 FPS. At 1440p, frame rates range from 44 to 104 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 18 to 43 FPS.

Official Requirements

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is 33% below recommended, but 20% above minimum for Path of Exile 2. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 53% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10500).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Intel Arc Pro A60 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

Intel Arc Pro A60:$380(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $380
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $764. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 81 FPS, equivalent to 0.11 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.212 fps/$0.156 fps/$0.135 fps/$0.106 fps/$
1440p0.136 fps/$0.092 fps/$0.080 fps/$0.058 fps/$
4k0.056 fps/$0.042 fps/$0.037 fps/$0.024 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Intel Arc Pro A60

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k ultra, the Intel Arc Pro A60 sets the ceiling at about 21 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 100 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 79% (FPS gap: 79 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your Intel Arc Pro A60 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 43%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 52%
HighGPU Limits CPU 50%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 63%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 61%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 67%
HighGPU Limits CPU 67%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 76%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 71%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 72%
HighGPU Limits CPU 69%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 79%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc Pro A60

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU67% - 90%
<>
GPU70% - 81%
<>
Medium
CPU60% - 88%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
High
CPU60% - 88%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU44% - 79%
<>
GPU96% - 100%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU40% - 53%
<>
GPU70% - 81%
<>
Medium
CPU32% - 52%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
High
CPU32% - 52%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU17% - 45%
<>
GPU96% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU31% - 34%
<>
GPU70% - 81%
<>
Medium
CPU22% - 33%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
High
CPU22% - 33%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU8% - 26%
<>
GPU96% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc Pro A60 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 8% and 90% and GPU utilization between 70% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays in a controlled operating range, while Intel Arc Pro A60 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 92% at 1080p to 92% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 72% to 26%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The Intel Arc Pro A60 reaches 98% average at its highest-load preset, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D peaks at 78% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 72% and GPU 92%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 40% and GPU 92%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 26% and GPU 92%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 74% (60-88%) and GPU 96% (94-99%), which keeps Intel Arc Pro A60 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc Pro A60 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Path of Exile 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i7-7700
RecommendedCore i5-10500
GPU - Intel Arc Pro A60
gpu icon
9,493
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 960
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060

Your CPU is 53% below recommended and your GPU is 33% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

+53%vsrecommended

GPU

-33%vsrecommended

CPU

+265%vsminimum

GPU

+20%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 960
Processor: Core i7-7700
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 100 GB
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2060
Processor: Core i5-10500
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 100 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc Pro A60 run Path of Exile 2 well?

Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Intel Arc Pro A60 can run Path of Exile 2 smoothly up to 1080p achieving around 81 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 33% below the recommended specs, and your CPU is 53% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Path of Exile 2?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $764 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $380 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (Rank #6 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Path of Exile 2 performance?

For Path of Exile 2, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Path of Exile 2?

Path of Exile 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Path of Exile 2?

Path of Exile 2 requires at minimum a Core i7-7700 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 100 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10500 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Path of Exile 2 FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Intel Arc Pro A60?

These Path of Exile 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.