A Valve classic that depends heavily on single-thread clock speed. It runs well on older hardware but benefits from a fast CPU.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, frame rates range from 21 to 43 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 16 to 32 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 11 to 21 FPS.
The Quadro 2000 is 235% above the recommended GPU (GeForce 8600 GT) for Team Fortress 2. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 1465% above the recommended CPU (Core 2 Duo).
The Quadro 2000 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $409. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 21 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.105 fps/$ | 0.083 fps/$ | 0.068 fps/$ | 0.051 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.078 fps/$ | 0.064 fps/$ | 0.051 fps/$ | 0.039 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.051 fps/$ | 0.042 fps/$ | 0.034 fps/$ | 0.027 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k medium, the Quadro 2000 sets the ceiling at about 17 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 562 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 97% (FPS gap: 545 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Quadro 2000 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | GPU Limits CPU 93% | GPU Limits CPU 94% | GPU Limits CPU 94% | GPU Limits CPU 95% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 95% | GPU Limits CPU 96% | GPU Limits CPU 96% | GPU Limits CPU 96% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 96% | GPU Limits CPU 97% | GPU Limits CPU 97% | GPU Limits CPU 97% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU0% - 0% GPU54% - 64% <> | CPU0% - 6% <> GPU59% - 77% <> | CPU0% - 8% <> GPU62% - 78% <> | CPU6% - 21% <> GPU38% - 56% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU0% - 9% <> GPU54% - 66% <> | CPU2% - 19% <> GPU59% - 79% <> | CPU3% - 21% <> GPU61% - 79% <> | CPU8% - 24% <> GPU38% - 60% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU0% - 9% <> GPU73% - 89% <> | CPU2% - 17% <> GPU80% - 100% <> | CPU2% - 18% <> GPU83% - 100% <> | CPU5% - 19% <> GPU79% - 100% <> |
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Quadro 2000 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 0% and 24% and GPU utilization between 38% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Quadro 2000 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 61% at 1080p to 88% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 5% to 9%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the Quadro 2000 averages 92% usage (83-100%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 10% (2-18%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 5% and GPU 61%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 11% and GPU 62%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 9% and GPU 88%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.
4K (Ultra HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 10% (2-17%) and GPU 90% (80-100%), which keeps Quadro 2000 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro 2000 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 1465% above and your GPU is 235% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+1465%vsrecommended
+235%vsrecommended
+1043%vsminimum
-37%vsminimum
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro 2000 will struggle to run Team Fortress 2 at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 21 FPS which is classified as "struggling". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $409 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $25 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (Rank #6 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.
For Team Fortress 2, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Quadro 2000 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Team Fortress 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Team Fortress 2 requires at minimum a Pentium 4 (3.0 GHz) (CPU) and GeForce 6 series (GPU) with 1 GB RAM and 15 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core 2 Duo and GeForce 8600 GT with 2 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro 2000 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Team Fortress 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
