Euro Truck Simulator 2FPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Quadro GP100

Euro Truck Simulator 2

The lighting engine has been updated over the years. It scales well, but running at 'Ultra' settings with high scaling can challenge even modern GPUs.

Euro Truck Simulator 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low203 FPS
medium164 FPS
high148 FPS
ultra125 FPS
1440P
low186 FPS
medium152 FPS
high135 FPS
ultra118 FPS
4K
low115 FPS
medium100 FPS
high96 FPS
ultra78 FPS

Performance Report

Euro Truck Simulator 2

Quadro GP100 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 125 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 118 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 78 FPS.

Official Requirements

The Quadro GP100 is 18% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1660) for Euro Truck Simulator 2. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 94% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

At lower resolutions (1080p (low/medium/high), 1440p (low/medium/high)), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (4k (low/medium/ultra)), the Quadro GP100 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p ultra, 1440p ultra, 4k high.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

Quadro GP100:$1335(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $7000
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $1719. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 125 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.118 fps/$0.095 fps/$0.086 fps/$0.073 fps/$
1440p0.108 fps/$0.088 fps/$0.079 fps/$0.069 fps/$
4k0.067 fps/$0.058 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.045 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Quadro GP100

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1440p high, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D sets the ceiling at about 176 FPS, while the Quadro GP100 could reach 205 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 14% (FPS gap: 29 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 6/12 cells, GPU limits 3/12, balanced 3/12.

Verdict

Well Balanced

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro GP100 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 8%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 7%
HighCPU Limits GPU 12%
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 11%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 8%
HighCPU Limits GPU 14%
UltraBalanced
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 9%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 9%
HighBalanced
UltraGPU Limits CPU 7%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro GP100

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU9% - 26%
<>
GPU59% - 79%
<>
Medium
CPU9% - 26%
<>
GPU59% - 79%
<>
High
CPU6% - 17%
<>
GPU58% - 85%
<>
Ultra
CPU6% - 17%
<>
GPU58% - 85%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 81%
<>
Medium
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 81%
<>
High
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 88%
<>
Ultra
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 88%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 81%
<>
Medium
CPU11% - 31%
<>
GPU53% - 81%
<>
High
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 88%
<>
Ultra
CPU8% - 23%
<>
GPU53% - 88%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Quadro GP100 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 6% and 31% and GPU utilization between 53% and 88%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Quadro GP100 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 71% at 1080p to 69% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 15% to 19%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The Quadro GP100 reaches 72% average at its highest-load preset, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D peaks at 21% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 15% and GPU 71%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 19% and GPU 69%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 19% and GPU 69%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 12% (6-17%) and GPU 72% (58-85%), which keeps Quadro GP100 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro GP100 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Euro Truck Simulator 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-6400
RecommendedCore i5-9600
GPU - Quadro GP100
gpu icon
13,710
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 660
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1660

Your CPU is 94% above and your GPU is 18% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+94%vsrecommended

GPU

+18%vsrecommended

CPU

+435%vsminimum

GPU

+234%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 660
Processor: Core i5-6400
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 25 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1660
Processor: Core i5-9600
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 25 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro GP100 run Euro Truck Simulator 2 well?

Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Quadro GP100 can run Euro Truck Simulator 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 78 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 18% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 94% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Euro Truck Simulator 2?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1719 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $1335 GPU (Rank #114 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Euro Truck Simulator 2 performance?

For Euro Truck Simulator 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is currently the limiting factor — the Quadro GP100 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high. GPU-limited at: 4k low, 4k medium, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Euro Truck Simulator 2?

Euro Truck Simulator 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Euro Truck Simulator 2?

Euro Truck Simulator 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-6400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600 and GeForce GTX 1660 with 12 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro GP100 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro GP100?

These Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.