ARC RaidersFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Quadro K5200

ARC Raiders

This extraction shooter bets on visual fidelity with UE5 and DX12, requiring AVX2 support. It uses volumetric lighting and dense effects, with a recommended baseline of RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT, indicating it is a demanding title.

ARC Raiders - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low43 FPS
medium37 FPS
high29 FPS
ultra21 FPS
1440P
low34 FPS
medium30 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra18 FPS
4K
low19 FPS
medium17 FPS
high14 FPS
ultra11 FPS

Performance Report

ARC Raiders

Quadro K5200 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 21 to 43 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 18 to 34 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 11 to 19 FPS.

⚠️Official Requirements

The Quadro K5200 is 30% below minimum GPU requirement for ARC Raiders. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 94% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Quadro K5200 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

Quadro K5200:$70(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $2250
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $454. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 21 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.095 fps/$0.081 fps/$0.064 fps/$0.046 fps/$
1440p0.075 fps/$0.066 fps/$0.053 fps/$0.040 fps/$
4k0.042 fps/$0.037 fps/$0.031 fps/$0.024 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Quadro K5200

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k ultra, the Quadro K5200 sets the ceiling at about 10 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 128 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 92% (FPS gap: 118 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your Quadro K5200 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 83%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 84%
HighGPU Limits CPU 85%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 87%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 87%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 88%
HighGPU Limits CPU 89%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 90%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 90%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 90%
HighGPU Limits CPU 91%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 92%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro K5200

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU18% - 31%
<>
GPU92% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU16% - 30%
<>
GPU94% - 94%
High
CPU16% - 30%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU17% - 31%
<>
GPU95% - 99%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU17% - 28%
<>
GPU93% - 93%
Medium
CPU15% - 27%
<>
GPU94% - 95%
<>
High
CPU15% - 27%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU16% - 28%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU14% - 21%
<>
GPU92% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU12% - 20%
<>
GPU94% - 95%
<>
High
CPU11% - 20%
<>
GPU98% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU12% - 21%
<>
GPU99% - 99%

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Quadro K5200 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 11% and 31% and GPU utilization between 92% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Quadro K5200 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 95% at 1080p to 96% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 24% to 17%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the Quadro K5200 averages 99% usage (99-99%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 16% (12-21%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 24% and GPU 95%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 22% and GPU 96%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 17% and GPU 96%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 24% (18-31%) and GPU 92% (92-93%), which keeps Quadro K5200 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The Quadro K5200 reaches 99% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

ARC Raiders Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-6600K
RecommendedCore i5-9600K
GPU - Quadro K5200
gpu icon
6,149
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. GPU is the limiting factor (30% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

+94%vsrecommended

GPU

-62%vsrecommended

CPU

+180%vsminimum

GPU

-30%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i5-6600K
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2070
Processor: Core i5-9600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro K5200 run ARC Raiders well?

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro K5200 will struggle to run ARC Raiders at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 21 FPS which is classified as "struggling". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run ARC Raiders?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $454 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $70 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (Rank #6 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve ARC Raiders performance?

For ARC Raiders, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Quadro K5200 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 35 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these ARC Raiders FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro K5200?

These ARC Raiders FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.