This extraction shooter bets on visual fidelity with UE5 and DX12, requiring AVX2 support. It uses volumetric lighting and dense effects, with a recommended baseline of RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT, indicating it is a demanding title.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, frame rates range from 6 to 24 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 4 to 15 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 3 to 6 FPS.
The Quadro M2000 is 54% below minimum GPU requirement for ARC Raiders. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 94% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600K).
The Quadro M2000 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $434. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 6 FPS, equivalent to 0.01 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.055 fps/$ | 0.044 fps/$ | 0.025 fps/$ | 0.014 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.035 fps/$ | 0.028 fps/$ | 0.016 fps/$ | 0.009 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.014 fps/$ | 0.014 fps/$ | 0.009 fps/$ | 0.007 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1440p ultra, the Quadro M2000 sets the ceiling at about 4 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 177 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 98% (FPS gap: 173 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Quadro M2000 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | GPU Limits CPU 91% | GPU Limits CPU 92% | GPU Limits CPU 95% | GPU Limits CPU 96% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 94% | GPU Limits CPU 95% | GPU Limits CPU 97% | GPU Limits CPU 98% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 96% | GPU Limits CPU 97% | GPU Limits CPU 97% | GPU Limits CPU 98% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU18% - 30% <> GPU93% - 94% <> | CPU17% - 30% <> GPU94% - 96% <> | CPU17% - 30% <> GPU94% - 99% <> | CPU18% - 31% <> GPU96% - 99% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU17% - 28% <> GPU93% - 93% | CPU16% - 28% <> GPU95% - 95% | CPU16% - 28% <> GPU94% - 100% <> | CPU17% - 28% <> GPU97% - 100% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU13% - 20% <> GPU93% - 93% | CPU13% - 20% <> GPU94% - 95% <> | CPU12% - 20% <> GPU98% - 99% <> | CPU13% - 21% <> GPU99% - 99% |
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Quadro M2000 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 12% and 31% and GPU utilization between 93% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Quadro M2000 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 96% at 1080p to 96% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 24% to 16%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the Quadro M2000 averages 99% usage (99-99%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 17% (13-21%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 24% and GPU 96%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 22% and GPU 96%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 16% and GPU 96%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 22% (17-28%) and GPU 93% (93-93%), which keeps Quadro M2000 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The Quadro M2000 reaches 99% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your hardware is below minimum requirements. GPU is the limiting factor (54% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.
+94%vsrecommended
-75%vsrecommended
+180%vsminimum
-54%vsminimum
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro M2000 will struggle to run ARC Raiders at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 6 FPS which is classified as "struggling". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $434 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $50 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (Rank #6 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.
For ARC Raiders, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Quadro M2000 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
ARC Raiders does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
ARC Raiders requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 35 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.
These ARC Raiders FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
