Rainbow Six SiegeFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Quadro M2000

Rainbow Six Siege

This tactical shooter uses the AnvilNext 2.0 engine and features procedural environmental destruction, which can be taxing on the CPU. The Vulkan API helps older hardware maintain performance by better utilizing available resources. Siege is sensitive to RAM speed and latency. The HD Texture Pack can push VRAM usage over 6GB, so cards with 8GB or more are recommended for the best visual experience at 1080p or 1440p.

Rainbow Six Siege - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low181 FPS
medium145 FPS
high121 FPS
ultra91 FPS
1440P
low116 FPS
medium84 FPS
high73 FPS
ultra64 FPS
4K
low55 FPS
medium36 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra22 FPS

Performance Report

Rainbow Six Siege

Quadro M2000 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 91 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 64 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 22 to 55 FPS.

Official Requirements

The Quadro M2000 is 25% below recommended, but 77% above minimum for Rainbow Six Siege. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 420% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-2500K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Quadro M2000 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

Quadro M2000:$50(updated 2/10/2026)
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $434. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 91 FPS, equivalent to 0.21 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.417 fps/$0.334 fps/$0.279 fps/$0.210 fps/$
1440p0.267 fps/$0.194 fps/$0.168 fps/$0.147 fps/$
4k0.127 fps/$0.083 fps/$0.060 fps/$0.051 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Quadro M2000

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k ultra, the Quadro M2000 sets the ceiling at about 22 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 318 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 93% (FPS gap: 296 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your Quadro M2000 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 74%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 76%
HighGPU Limits CPU 76%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 80%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 82%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 85%
HighGPU Limits CPU 85%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 86%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 87%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 90%
HighGPU Limits CPU 92%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 93%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro M2000

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU62% - 91%
<>
GPU59% - 77%
<>
Medium
CPU62% - 91%
<>
GPU59% - 77%
<>
High
CPU31% - 46%
<>
GPU100% - 100%
Ultra
CPU31% - 46%
<>
GPU100% - 100%

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU62% - 76%
<>
GPU58% - 76%
<>
Medium
CPU62% - 76%
<>
GPU58% - 76%
<>
High
CPU11% - 40%
<>
GPU100% - 100%
Ultra
CPU11% - 40%
<>
GPU100% - 100%

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU62% - 76%
<>
GPU58% - 76%
<>
Medium
CPU62% - 76%
<>
GPU58% - 76%
<>
High
CPU11% - 40%
<>
GPU100% - 100%
Ultra
CPU11% - 40%
<>
GPU100% - 100%

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Quadro M2000 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 11% and 91% and GPU utilization between 58% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays in a controlled operating range, while Quadro M2000 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 84% at 1080p to 84% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 57% to 48%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) High, the Quadro M2000 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 38% (31-46%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 57% and GPU 84%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 48% and GPU 84%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 48% and GPU 84%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 69% (62-76%) and GPU 67% (58-76%), which keeps Quadro M2000 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro M2000 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Rainbow Six Siege Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-560
RecommendedCore i5-2500K
GPU - Quadro M2000
gpu icon
4,026
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 460
RecommendedGeForce GTX 670

Your CPU is 420% below recommended and your GPU is 25% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

+420%vsrecommended

GPU

-25%vsrecommended

CPU

+1417%vsminimum

GPU

+77%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 460
Processor: Core i3-560
Memory: 6 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 670
Processor: Core i5-2500K
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 61 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro M2000 run Rainbow Six Siege well?

Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Quadro M2000 can run Rainbow Six Siege smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 64 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 25% below the recommended specs, and your CPU is 420% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Rainbow Six Siege?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $434 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $50 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (Rank #6 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Rainbow Six Siege performance?

For Rainbow Six Siege, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Quadro M2000 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Rainbow Six Siege?

Rainbow Six Siege requires at minimum a Core i3-560 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 460 (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 61 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-2500K and GeForce GTX 670 with 8 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Rainbow Six Siege FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro M2000?

These Rainbow Six Siege FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.