ARC RaidersFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Quadro P5200

ARC Raiders

This extraction shooter bets on visual fidelity with UE5 and DX12, requiring AVX2 support. It uses volumetric lighting and dense effects, with a recommended baseline of RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT, indicating it is a demanding title.

ARC Raiders - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low82 FPS
medium69 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra37 FPS
1440P
low71 FPS
medium61 FPS
high47 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low37 FPS
medium33 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra17 FPS

Performance Report

ARC Raiders

Quadro P5200 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 37 to 82 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 33 to 71 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 17 to 37 FPS.

Official Requirements

The Quadro P5200 is 28% below recommended, but 32% above minimum for ARC Raiders. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 94% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Quadro P5200 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

Quadro P5200:$240(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $500
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $624. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 37 FPS, equivalent to 0.06 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.131 fps/$0.111 fps/$0.083 fps/$0.059 fps/$
1440p0.114 fps/$0.098 fps/$0.075 fps/$0.053 fps/$
4k0.059 fps/$0.053 fps/$0.038 fps/$0.027 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Quadro P5200

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k ultra, the Quadro P5200 sets the ceiling at about 18 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 128 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 86% (FPS gap: 110 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your Quadro P5200 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 64%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 66%
HighGPU Limits CPU 71%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 75%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 72%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 75%
HighGPU Limits CPU 78%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 81%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 80%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 82%
HighGPU Limits CPU 85%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 86%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro P5200

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU15% - 32%
<>
GPU82% - 92%
<>
Medium
CPU16% - 32%
<>
GPU91% - 98%
<>
High
CPU15% - 32%
<>
GPU93% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU16% - 32%
<>
GPU95% - 99%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU14% - 29%
<>
GPU83% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU14% - 29%
<>
GPU92% - 100%
<>
High
CPU13% - 28%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU14% - 30%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU11% - 22%
<>
GPU84% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU10% - 22%
<>
GPU92% - 99%
<>
High
CPU10% - 21%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU11% - 22%
<>
GPU100% - 100%

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Quadro P5200 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 10% and 32% and GPU utilization between 82% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Quadro P5200 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 94% at 1080p to 96% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 24% to 16%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the Quadro P5200 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 16% (11-22%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 24% and GPU 94%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 22% and GPU 95%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 16% and GPU 96%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 22% (14-29%) and GPU 88% (83-93%), which keeps Quadro P5200 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The Quadro P5200 reaches 100% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

ARC Raiders Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-6600K
RecommendedCore i5-9600K
GPU - Quadro P5200
gpu icon
11,650
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070

Your CPU is 94% below recommended and your GPU is 28% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

+94%vsrecommended

GPU

-28%vsrecommended

CPU

+180%vsminimum

GPU

+32%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i5-6600K
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2070
Processor: Core i5-9600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro P5200 run ARC Raiders well?

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro P5200 will struggle to run ARC Raiders at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 37 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run ARC Raiders?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $624 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $240 GPU (Rank #28 Value)). Your build is already very cost-efficient, but if you want even more FPS, the next good option is upgrading the GPU. For example, upgrading to the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) for around $900 (Rank #11 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve ARC Raiders performance?

For ARC Raiders, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Quadro P5200 is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 35 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these ARC Raiders FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro P5200?

These ARC Raiders FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.