ARC RaidersFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

ARC Raiders

This extraction shooter bets on visual fidelity with UE5 and DX12, requiring AVX2 support. It uses volumetric lighting and dense effects, with a recommended baseline of RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT, indicating it is a demanding title.

ARC Raiders - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low114 FPS
medium94 FPS
high69 FPS
ultra49 FPS
1440P
low89 FPS
medium78 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra41 FPS
4K
low49 FPS
medium45 FPS
high32 FPS
ultra27 FPS

Performance Report

ARC Raiders

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 49 to 114 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 41 to 89 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 27 to 49 FPS.

Official Requirements

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is 3% below recommended, but 78% above minimum for ARC Raiders. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 94% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k high, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU sets the ceiling at about 31 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 150 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 79% (FPS gap: 119 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 53%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 56%
HighGPU Limits CPU 63%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 68%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 64%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 68%
HighGPU Limits CPU 74%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 77%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 73%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 75%
HighGPU Limits CPU 79%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 79%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU21% - 38%
<>
GPU68% - 87%
<>
Medium
CPU20% - 38%
<>
GPU80% - 94%
<>
High
CPU20% - 37%
<>
GPU94% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU21% - 38%
<>
GPU95% - 99%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU17% - 29%
<>
GPU71% - 87%
<>
Medium
CPU16% - 30%
<>
GPU80% - 95%
<>
High
CPU16% - 29%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU17% - 30%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU13% - 22%
<>
GPU71% - 86%
<>
Medium
CPU13% - 22%
<>
GPU80% - 94%
<>
High
CPU13% - 22%
<>
GPU98% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU13% - 22%
<>
GPU99% - 99%

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 13% and 38% and GPU utilization between 68% and 100%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 90% at 1080p to 91% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 29% to 18%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU averages 99% usage (99-99%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 18% (13-22%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 29% and GPU 90%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 23% and GPU 91%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 18% and GPU 91%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 23% (16-30%) and GPU 88% (80-95%), which keeps Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 99% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

ARC Raiders Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-6600K
RecommendedCore i5-9600K
GPU - Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
gpu icon
15,633
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070

Your CPU is 94% below recommended and your GPU is 3% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

+94%vsrecommended

GPU

-3%vsrecommended

CPU

+180%vsminimum

GPU

+78%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i5-6600K
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2070
Processor: Core i5-9600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU run ARC Raiders well?

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU will struggle to run ARC Raiders at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 49 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run ARC Raiders?

Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve ARC Raiders performance?

For ARC Raiders, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 35 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these ARC Raiders FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

These ARC Raiders FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.