The transition from Global Offensive to Counter-Strike 2 marked the end of the DX9 era for Valve. The new Source 2 engine introduces physically based rendering and dynamic smoke that interacts with lighting, significantly changing the performance profile. While CS:GO was light on the GPU, CS2 requires a competent card to handle these effects without stuttering. It remains CPU-heavy at competitive settings, where the 'sub-tick' server architecture demands strong single-thread performance. CPUs with large L3 caches, like AMD's X3D line, offer a major advantage. 8GB of RAM is now the absolute minimum, though more is recommended to avoid hitches.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 322 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 197 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 79 FPS.
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is 28% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Counter-Strike 2. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 97% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-9700K).
The Radeon RX 6750 XT sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $704. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 322 FPS, equivalent to 0.46 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.705 fps/$ | 0.658 fps/$ | 0.537 fps/$ | 0.457 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.464 fps/$ | 0.422 fps/$ | 0.335 fps/$ | 0.280 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.202 fps/$ | 0.178 fps/$ | 0.141 fps/$ | 0.112 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k ultra, the Radeon RX 6750 XT sets the ceiling at about 63 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 319 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 80% (FPS gap: 256 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 12/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Radeon RX 6750 XT is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | GPU Limits CPU 35% | GPU Limits CPU 36% | GPU Limits CPU 47% | GPU Limits CPU 60% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 56% | GPU Limits CPU 61% | GPU Limits CPU 65% | GPU Limits CPU 74% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 72% | GPU Limits CPU 74% | GPU Limits CPU 77% | GPU Limits CPU 80% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU44% - 62% <> GPU33% - 57% <> | CPU35% - 56% <> GPU36% - 50% <> | CPU30% - 56% <> GPU33% - 58% <> | CPU26% - 52% <> GPU41% - 67% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU27% - 56% <> GPU64% - 66% <> | CPU24% - 53% <> GPU68% - 85% <> | CPU20% - 54% <> GPU70% - 93% <> | CPU17% - 51% <> GPU77% - 95% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU27% - 54% <> GPU75% - 91% <> | CPU26% - 50% <> GPU89% - 97% <> | CPU21% - 51% <> GPU91% - 98% <> | CPU18% - 49% <> GPU92% - 99% <> |
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 17% and 62% and GPU utilization between 33% and 99%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while Radeon RX 6750 XT carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 47% at 1080p to 92% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 45% to 37%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the Radeon RX 6750 XT averages 96% usage (92-99%), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stays at 34% (18-49%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 45% and GPU 47%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 38% and GPU 77%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 37% and GPU 92%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 34% (17-51%) and GPU 86% (77-95%), which keeps Radeon RX 6750 XT well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The Radeon RX 6750 XT reaches 96% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 97% above and your GPU is 28% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+97%vsrecommended
+28%vsrecommended
+1247%vsminimum
+412%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Radeon RX 6750 XT can run Counter-Strike 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 79 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 28% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 97% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $704 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $320 GPU (Rank #41 Value)). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti for around $799 (Rank #42 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.
For Counter-Strike 2, upgrading the GPU would give you the most noticeable improvement. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the limiting factor here, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has spare capacity. A more powerful GPU would unlock higher FPS, especially at higher resolutions and quality presets. GPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Counter-Strike 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Counter-Strike 2 requires at minimum a Core i5 750 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 85 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-9700K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Radeon RX 6750 XT both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Counter-Strike 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
